Skip to main content
Kent Academic Repository

Practical and ethical issues in big data and machine learning forecasts of Zambian Community Forestry engagement

Pienkowski, Thomas, Mills, Morena, Clark, Matt, Moombe, Kaala, Chilufya, Henry, Sfyridis, Alexandros, Sze, Jocelyne Shimin, Olsson, Erik, Jørgensen, Andreas Christ Sølvsten (2026) Practical and ethical issues in big data and machine learning forecasts of Zambian Community Forestry engagement. Conservation Letters, 19 (2). Article Number e70022. ISSN 1755-263X. (doi:10.1111/con4.70022) (KAR id:112676)

PDF Publisher pdf
Language: English


Download this file
(PDF/1MB)
[thumbnail of Conservation Letters - 2026 - Pienkowski - Practical and Ethical Issues in Big Data and Machine Learning Forecasts of.pdf]
Preview
Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader
PDF Author's Accepted Manuscript
Language: English

Restricted to Repository staff only
Contact us about this publication
[thumbnail of 2_Predicting_patterns_manuscript_clean_R4.pdf]
Official URL:
https://doi.org/10.1111/con4.70022

Abstract

Approaches integrating geospatial “big data” and machine learning will likely be increasingly used to predict conservation-related human behaviour, such as patterns of local engagement, in socio-ecological systems. Yet, few studies evaluate both the technical and ethical aspects of such applications. Here, we provide a nation-scale worked example that combines machine learning and publicly available data to predict spatial patterns of Community Forestry establishment among 539,221 settlements across Zambia. Our model accurately predicted out-of-sample spatial establishment patterns three-quarters of the time (balanced accuracy = 76.5%, sensitivity = 64.0%, specificity = 89.1%), though it had a high false positive rate (precision = 24.3%). Accurately forecasting conservation establishment patterns for effective resource allocation requires better data on local preferences and programmatic decision-making, among other factors. Furthermore, such artificial intelligence applications risk making decision-making more technocratic, top-down, and opaque; therefore, they should only inform deliberation over possible future scenarios within wider, multistakeholder governance processes.

Item Type: Article
DOI/Identification number: 10.1111/con4.70022
Subjects: G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation
Institutional Unit: Schools > School of Natural Sciences
Schools > School of Natural Sciences > Conservation
Institutes > Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology
Former Institutional Unit:
There are no former institutional units.
Funders: Leverhulme Trust (https://ror.org/012mzw131)
UK Research and Innovation (https://ror.org/001aqnf71)
European Union (https://ror.org/019w4f821)
Depositing User: Thomas Pienkowski
Date Deposited: 09 Jan 2026 12:13 UTC
Last Modified: 11 Mar 2026 03:52 UTC
Resource URI: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/112676 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)

University of Kent Author Information

Pienkowski, Thomas.

Creator's ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3803-7533
CReDIT Contributor Roles: Writing - original draft (Lead), Conceptualisation (Lead), Writing - review and editing (Lead), Data curation (Lead), Resources (Lead), Methodology (Lead), Funding acquisition (Lead), Investigation (Lead), Formal analysis (Lead), Visualisation (Lead)
  • Depositors only (login required):

Total unique views of this page since July 2020. For more details click on the image.