Barker, Rhiannon, Wilson, Patricia M., Butler, Claire (2023) How can the priorities of older, frail patients and their carers be used to inform policy and practice at the end of life? Insights from qualitative research across multiple settings. BMJ Open, 13 . Article Number e068751. (doi:10.1136/ bmjopen-2022-068751) (KAR id:112484)
|
PDF
Publisher pdf
Language: English |
|
|
Download this file (PDF/357kB) |
Preview |
| Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader | |
| Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1136/ bmjopen-2022-068751 |
|
Abstract
Objectives The paper reports on experiences from older
patients and their carers of current provision of end-of-
life
care in England. It draws on data from a study that sought
to explore the extent to which national policy for end-of-
life
care in England was aligned with the aspirations of
stakeholders. Specifically, the study explored the balance
between clinical healthcare vs social and relational care
asking how this was aligned to patient priorities at this
time of life. Here, we examine the extent to which the
patient voice is attended to when health and social care
services are delivered to older people and consider how
the experiences of patients and carers could be used to
improve outcomes.
Design The work draws on data collected as part of a
realist informed study using a case study approach to
gather data.
Setting Clinical Commissioning Groups were used as
the boundaries of the three case studies and within these
geographical areas data was collected in hospitals, care
homes, hospices and patient homes.
Participants This paper reports on in-depth
interviews
conducted with 21 patients at the end of life and 22
relatives/carers (n=43).
Results While the medical care patients received was
generally praised, it was reported that relational care,
particularly in respect to adult social care received at
home, was fragmented and of varying quality. Relational
and social support were key to the patient and carer
experience yet appeared to be hard to access.
Conclusion The work highlights the misalignment
between the availability of different types of care at the
end of life and patient priorities. More attention should
be paid to the voice of older patients and their carers,
drawing on their experiences to influence the way policy is translated into practice.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| DOI/Identification number: | 10.1136/ bmjopen-2022-068751 |
| Subjects: | R Medicine > RZ Other systems of medicine |
| Institutional Unit: | Schools > School of Social Sciences > Centre for Health Services Studies |
| Former Institutional Unit: |
There are no former institutional units.
|
| Funders: | University of Kent (https://ror.org/00xkeyj56) |
| Depositing User: | Claire Butler |
| Date Deposited: | 03 Jan 2026 16:22 UTC |
| Last Modified: | 04 Jan 2026 05:41 UTC |
| Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/112484 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Link to SensusAccess
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5787-9736
Altmetric
Altmetric