Tamè, Luigi, Khan, Naiha, Allarakhia, Kane, Longo, Matthew R., Azañón, Elena (2026) Tactile adaptation transfers between distance and continuous size. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 293 (2063). Article Number 20252678. ISSN 0962-8452. E-ISSN 1471-2954. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2025.2678) (KAR id:112447)
|
PDF
Publisher pdf
Language: English
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
|
|
|
Download this file (PDF/1MB) |
Preview |
| Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader | |
|
PDF
Author's Accepted Manuscript
Language: English Restricted to Repository staff only
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
|
|
|
Contact us about this publication
|
|
| Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2025.2678 |
|
Abstract
Tactile spatial perceived distance between two touches is larger on sensitive skin regions. While such distortions are substantial for perception of distance between two distinct touches, they are significantly reduced when participants estimate the size of a single continuous object touching the skin. Here, we examine whether some of the mechanisms involved in processing the distance between two touches are shared with and influence those underlying the perception of continuous objects, leveraging adaptation aftereffects. In Experiment 1, participants adapted to specific distances between two points and we assessed the effect on both point-based and continuous object perception. Experiment 2 tested whether adaptation to continuous objects influenced distance perception similarly. Results showed that two-point adaptation induced aftereffects of similar magnitude for both two-point and object stimuli, while adaptation to continuous objects produced larger aftereffects specifically for object stimuli. These results indicate that aftereffects generated by simple touches generalize across different stimulation types, whereas those induced by continuous objects remain stimulus-specific. Therefore, it is reasonable to assert that distance perception of two touches arises at early stages of tactile processing that subsequently affects perception at later stages. Whereas, distance perception of continuous objects is processed at later stages and object specific.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| DOI/Identification number: | 10.1098/rspb.2025.2678 |
| Uncontrolled keywords: | touch; adaptation; size constancy; tactile aftereffect, anisotropy, somatosensory system |
| Subjects: | B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology |
| Institutional Unit: | Schools > School of Psychology > Psychology |
| Former Institutional Unit: |
There are no former institutional units.
|
| Funders: | University of Kent (https://ror.org/00xkeyj56) |
| Depositing User: | Luigi Tame |
| Date Deposited: | 19 Dec 2025 15:07 UTC |
| Last Modified: | 28 Jan 2026 15:28 UTC |
| Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/112447 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Link to SensusAccess
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9172-2281
Altmetric
Altmetric