Storey, Jennifer E., Pina, Afroditi (2025) Technology-facilitated intimate partner violence: An examination of prevalence, perpetration type and methods and the impact of COVID-19. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, . Article Number 08862605251391169. ISSN 1552-6518. (doi:10.1177/08862605251391169) (KAR id:112284)
|
PDF
Publisher pdf
Language: English
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
|
|
|
Download this file (PDF/1MB) |
Preview |
| Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader | |
| Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605251391169 |
|
| Additional URLs: |
|
Abstract
It is widely acknowledged that with the increased use of technology in society much of the abuse and coercive control perpetrated by intimate partners is now also digital in nature and involves technology as a core conduit. This study examined the presence of Technology-facilitated intimate partner violence (TFIPV) in 4,501 cases of online harm reported to The Cyber Helpline, a charity supporting victims of cyber harm, between March, 2019 and March, 2021. Aims were to identify the prevalence and type of TFIPV perpetrated and the methods of abuse used by perpetrators to commit TFIPV. The study further aimed to determine whether these variables differed based on relationship type and COVID-19 pandemic restrictions. TFIPV was present in 12.3% ( n = 554) of cases reported and increased by 427.3% during the pandemic. Fourteen types of TFIPV were identified with the most common being cyberstalking and extortion. Varied methods of TFIPV perpetration were identified, with less sophisticated methods such as social media and video call recording being the most common. Types and methods of TFIPV varied by relationship type and time period. Extortion was most common in brief relationships and during the pandemic, suggesting opportunity and profit motivations. Conversely, unwanted contact, unauthorised access and device interception were more common in long-term relationships, with the latter also being more common pre-pandemic, likely due to greater victim access and knowledge. Findings have implications for victim protection, including the targeting of education to professionals and victims based on relationship type, common types and methods of TFIPV and dispelling misconceptions around TFIPV.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| DOI/Identification number: | 10.1177/08862605251391169 |
| Uncontrolled keywords: | internet and abuse, intimate partner violence/abuse, prevalence, cyberstalking, technology- or image-based, domestic violence |
| Subjects: | H Social Sciences |
| Institutional Unit: | Schools > School of Psychology |
| Former Institutional Unit: |
There are no former institutional units.
|
| Funders: | Home Office (https://ror.org/00y81cg83) |
| SWORD Depositor: | JISC Publications Router |
| Depositing User: | JISC Publications Router |
| Date Deposited: | 11 Dec 2025 14:54 UTC |
| Last Modified: | 11 Dec 2025 15:49 UTC |
| Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/112284 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Link to SensusAccess
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6432-2514
Altmetric
Altmetric