Skip to main content
Kent Academic Repository

Call broadcast surveys monitor owls with more precision than passive surveys by citizen scientists or acoustic recording units

Sperring, V. F., Wilson, M., Isaac, B., Macgregor, N. A., Clarke, R. H. (2025) Call broadcast surveys monitor owls with more precision than passive surveys by citizen scientists or acoustic recording units. Wildlife Research, 52 (5). Article Number WR24140. ISSN 1448-5494. (doi:10.1071/wr24140) (KAR id:111828)

Abstract

Context

Population monitoring that effectively detects population changes is an important component of threatened species management. Call broadcast surveys are regularly used for robust monitoring of vocal or territorial species; however, they can be resource intensive. Passive monitoring approaches involving citizen scientists and acoustic recording units may be less costly, and consequently these methods are increasingly being advocated.

Aims

This study investigated the utility of three different monitoring approaches to detect population trends in the Critically Endangered Norfolk Island morepork Ninox novaeseelandiae undulata. It compared the effectiveness of call broadcast with that of passive citizen scientist and acoustic recording surveys.

Methods

Between November and December 2020, we trialled each technique on Norfolk Island. The coefficient of variation in the number of moreporks heard per survey, and the mean detectability at each site were calculated as the core metrics for each technique. The statistical power of each technique to detect population trends over time was also calculated to compare efficacy. An extensive island-wide call broadcast survey, roost searching, and GPS tracking program were used to establish an independent population estimate.

Key results

We established a population estimate of 25 individuals. The call broadcast approach had the highest precision and highest site detectability. This approach was also assessed as being capable of detecting a change of just two or three moreporks per year, after three years of monitoring. By contrast, approaches using passive citizen science surveys and acoustic recording units would require at least ten years of monitoring to detect similar population trends.

Conclusions

Call broadcast surveys had a greater capacity to achieve high detectability and precise monitoring, relative to the passive approaches.

Implications

The high precision of call broadcast appears to justify the higher resource requirements relative to other methods examined in this study, where the target species is territorial and extremely rare. Call broadcast surveys are recommended for long-term monitoring of Norfolk Island moreporks.

Item Type: Article
DOI/Identification number: 10.1071/wr24140
Uncontrolled keywords: call broadcast, citizen scientists, passive acoustic recording units, population monitoring, threatened species
Subjects: Q Science > QH Natural history > QH75 Conservation (Biology)
Institutional Unit: Institutes > Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology
Former Institutional Unit:
There are no former institutional units.
Funders: Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water (https://ror.org/01db6n192)
Director of National Parks (https://ror.org/02b3hht72)
SWORD Depositor: JISC Publications Router
Depositing User: JISC Publications Router
Date Deposited: 12 Nov 2025 16:52 UTC
Last Modified: 14 Nov 2025 13:40 UTC
Resource URI: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/111828 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)

University of Kent Author Information

  • Depositors only (login required):

Total unique views of this page since July 2020. For more details click on the image.