Sperring, V. F., Wilson, M., Isaac, B., Macgregor, N. A., Clarke, R. H. (2025) Call broadcast surveys monitor owls with more precision than passive surveys by citizen scientists or acoustic recording units. Wildlife Research, 52 (5). Article Number WR24140. ISSN 1448-5494. (doi:10.1071/wr24140) (KAR id:111828)
|
PDF
Publisher pdf
Language: English
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
|
|
|
Download this file (PDF/724kB) |
Preview |
| Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader | |
| Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1071/wr24140 |
|
Abstract
Context
Population monitoring that effectively detects population changes is an important component of threatened species management. Call broadcast surveys are regularly used for robust monitoring of vocal or territorial species; however, they can be resource intensive. Passive monitoring approaches involving citizen scientists and acoustic recording units may be less costly, and consequently these methods are increasingly being advocated.
Aims
This study investigated the utility of three different monitoring approaches to detect population trends in the Critically Endangered Norfolk Island morepork Ninox novaeseelandiae undulata. It compared the effectiveness of call broadcast with that of passive citizen scientist and acoustic recording surveys.
Methods
Between November and December 2020, we trialled each technique on Norfolk Island. The coefficient of variation in the number of moreporks heard per survey, and the mean detectability at each site were calculated as the core metrics for each technique. The statistical power of each technique to detect population trends over time was also calculated to compare efficacy. An extensive island-wide call broadcast survey, roost searching, and GPS tracking program were used to establish an independent population estimate.
Key results
We established a population estimate of 25 individuals. The call broadcast approach had the highest precision and highest site detectability. This approach was also assessed as being capable of detecting a change of just two or three moreporks per year, after three years of monitoring. By contrast, approaches using passive citizen science surveys and acoustic recording units would require at least ten years of monitoring to detect similar population trends.
Conclusions
Call broadcast surveys had a greater capacity to achieve high detectability and precise monitoring, relative to the passive approaches.
Implications
The high precision of call broadcast appears to justify the higher resource requirements relative to other methods examined in this study, where the target species is territorial and extremely rare. Call broadcast surveys are recommended for long-term monitoring of Norfolk Island moreporks.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| DOI/Identification number: | 10.1071/wr24140 |
| Uncontrolled keywords: | call broadcast, citizen scientists, passive acoustic recording units, population monitoring, threatened species |
| Subjects: | Q Science > QH Natural history > QH75 Conservation (Biology) |
| Institutional Unit: | Institutes > Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology |
| Former Institutional Unit: |
There are no former institutional units.
|
| Funders: |
Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water (https://ror.org/01db6n192)
Director of National Parks (https://ror.org/02b3hht72) |
| SWORD Depositor: | JISC Publications Router |
| Depositing User: | JISC Publications Router |
| Date Deposited: | 12 Nov 2025 16:52 UTC |
| Last Modified: | 14 Nov 2025 13:40 UTC |
| Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/111828 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Link to SensusAccess
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7995-0230
Altmetric
Altmetric