Hammond, Jonathan, Goulding, Rebecca, Drinkwater, Jessica, Kent, Lindsey, Bailey, Simon, Checkland, Kath, Voorhees, Jennifer (2025) Understanding the human fit of access during initial recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study in English general practice. BMJ Open, 15 (10). Article Number e095120. ISSN 2044-6055. (doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-095120) (KAR id:111633)
|
PDF
Publisher pdf
Language: English
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
|
|
|
Download this file (PDF/1MB) |
Preview |
| Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader | |
| Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-095120 |
|
Abstract
Objectives: Access to general practice in England is a challenging issue of enduring importance. COVID-19 precipitated various abrupt changes, exposing and compounding existing problems. The access as human fit conceptualisation provides a nuanced understanding of access that extends beyond a limited focus on appointment numbers and speed. This qualitative study explored the pandemic’s impact on access to general practice and the experiences of patients and healthcare staff in England using access as human fit as an analytical framework.
Design: A community-based participatory approach underpinned by qualitative semi-structured interviews and focus groups, and observations.
Setting and participants: The following were conducted in Northwest England (December 2021—August 2022): interviews (10 participants) with patients, general practice staff and professionals; seven focus groups (42 participants) with patients from general practice patient groups and underserved groups; and twenty observation sessions of non-clinical access encounters (seven general practice and Primary Care Network premises; 45 hours total).
Analysis: A rapid qualitative analysis methodology facilitated an abductive thematic approach, applying the dimensions of access as human fit to the data.
Results: The access as human fit framework highlighted key areas where there is a lack of fit between patients and staff. Patients expressed that the array of access options and changes made it hard to know how to be a patient; some thought general practice should be ‘back to normal’ and the pandemic was an excuse to restrict access. Providers reported working harder than ever with insufficient resources.
Conclusions: The pandemic created greater distance between staff and patient realities of access. Access as a human fit facilitated in-depth exploration of patient and staff experiences, improving understanding and identifying key issues. Broader adoption and application of this framework, within policy and practice, could focus improvement efforts, optimise access fit and improve patient satisfaction and staff retention.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| DOI/Identification number: | 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-095120 |
| Subjects: | H Social Sciences |
| Institutional Unit: | Schools > School of Social Sciences > Centre for Health Services Studies |
| Former Institutional Unit: |
There are no former institutional units.
|
| Funders: | University of Kent (https://ror.org/00xkeyj56) |
| Depositing User: | Simon Bailey |
| Date Deposited: | 15 Oct 2025 10:20 UTC |
| Last Modified: | 16 Oct 2025 17:59 UTC |
| Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/111633 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Link to SensusAccess
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9142-2791
Altmetric
Altmetric