Skip to main content
Kent Academic Repository

“A lovely safe umbrella to describe yourself with” or “meaningless”: an online survey of UK-based Neurodivergent adults’ views of neurodiversity-related terminology

Grant, Aimee, Leigh, Jennifer S., Botha, Monique, Macdonald, Stephen, Williams, Kathryn, Williams, Gemma, Rose, Kieron, Memmott, Ann, Pearson, Amy (2025) “A lovely safe umbrella to describe yourself with” or “meaningless”: an online survey of UK-based Neurodivergent adults’ views of neurodiversity-related terminology. Neurodiversity, 3 . (doi:10.1177/27546330251390590) (KAR id:111523)

PDF Publisher pdf
Language: English


Download this file
(PDF/704kB)
[thumbnail of grant_et_al_a_lovely_safe_umbrella.pdf]
Preview
Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader
PDF Author's Accepted Manuscript
Language: English

Restricted to Repository staff only
Contact us about this publication
[thumbnail of 883cafe5-8535-4ee5-a774-b93717b33832.pdf]
Official URL:
https://doi.org/10.1177/27546330251390590

Abstract

Background: Neurodivergence refers to people with ways of behaving and thinking that diverge from the norm. Examples include Autism, Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), dyspraxia, dyslexia and Tourette syndrome. Neurodivergent people report being stigmatised including by language. The language preferences of neurodivergent adults have been largely restricted to studies focused on single forms of neurodivergence, primarily Autism.

Methods: We undertook an online survey with 901 neurodivergent adults from the UK, focused on their use of and thoughts about terminology related to neurodivergence, including terms such as “neurodiversity” and “neurodivergence”. Analysis utilised descriptive statistics and thematic analysis.

Results: Almost all participants (98.8%) had heard of neurodiversity, and 74.8% used neurodiversity terminology. We developed three themes. First, “an umbrella term”, focused on the positive and negative aspects of how “neurodivergence” incorporated multiple forms of neurodivergence. Second, “understanding of neurodivergence (vs neurodiverse)”, centred around a lack of understanding of neurodiversity terminology. Third, “stigma and identity” focused on neurodiversity terminology’s potential to reduce stigma, and simultaneously increase stigma towards individual types of neurodivergence, including Autism and ADHD.

Conclusion: Those providing services to neurodivergent people should generally use neurodiversity terminology correctly, but could also mirror the individual’s language choices when communicating one-to-one.

Item Type: Article
DOI/Identification number: 10.1177/27546330251390590
Uncontrolled keywords: Neurodiversity, Stigma, Identity, Adults, ADHD, Autism, Communication and language, Developmental Disabilities, Dyslexia
Subjects: H Social Sciences
Institutional Unit: Schools > School of Social Sciences
Former Institutional Unit:
There are no former institutional units.
Funders: University of Kent (https://ror.org/00xkeyj56)
Depositing User: Jennifer Leigh
Date Deposited: 07 Oct 2025 16:18 UTC
Last Modified: 13 Nov 2025 09:50 UTC
Resource URI: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/111523 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)

University of Kent Author Information

  • Depositors only (login required):

Total unique views of this page since July 2020. For more details click on the image.