Rastgoo, Reyhane, Nayeri, Danial, Mohammadi, Alireza, Bath, Alistair J., Farhadinia, Mohammad S. (2025) Who welcomes the bear: Evidence for a disconnect between attitudes and acceptability of killing brown bears. People and Nature, 7 (9). pp. 2106-2118. ISSN 2575-8314. (doi:10.1002/pan3.70099) (KAR id:110823)
|
PDF
Publisher pdf
Language: English
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
|
|
|
Download this file (PDF/962kB) |
Preview |
| Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader | |
| Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.70099 |
|
Abstract
Acceptability of large carnivores is influenced by socio-psychological factors and is crucial to coexistence. When large carnivores cause real or perceived threats such as damage to local economy or safety, people may engage in lethal control. However, in the presence of legal protection for the species and associated penalties, lethal retaliation can diminish or happen elusively. Therefore, it is helpful for managers to understand people's attitudes and acceptability associated with support for killing large carnivores in conflict situations and the demographics of those involved in lethal retaliation.
We interviewed 390 respondents living in 26 villages in northern Iran, where communities are largely dependent on agriculture and livestock for their livelihood and conflicts with brown bears (Ursus arctos) are common. Our goal was to assess the acceptability of killing bears in four different scenarios, from low-intensity to high-intensity interaction.
The results showed that although respondents generally had a slightly positive attitude towards bears, those with negative attitudes were associated with higher acceptability of killing bears. The mean acceptability of killing bears increased as human–bear interaction intensified. Younger, less educated and female respondents were more supportive of killing bears, while respondents with an alternative source of income were less accepting of killing them.
We provide five recommendations to foster coexistence, including leveraging positive attitudes through strategies like building advocacy networks, promoting inclusive outreach programmes, particularly for female and younger respondents. Also, we recommend emergency conflict mitigation teams take immediate action for conflict mitigation in areas with higher acceptance of killing bears to prevent retaliatory behaviour. Furthermore, providing an alternative source of income and focusing on preventive methods and effective strategies are recommended.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| DOI/Identification number: | 10.1002/pan3.70099 |
| Uncontrolled keywords: | attitudes; coexistence; human–wildlife conflict; lethal retaliation; mixed effect models; Potential for Conflict Index2; Ursus arctos |
| Subjects: | G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > GN Anthropology |
| Institutional Unit: |
Schools > School of Natural Sciences > Conservation Institutes > Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology |
| Former Institutional Unit: |
There are no former institutional units.
|
| Funders: | UK Research and Innovation (https://ror.org/001aqnf71) |
| Depositing User: | Mohammad Farhadinia |
| Date Deposited: | 01 Aug 2025 14:07 UTC |
| Last Modified: | 13 Oct 2025 13:19 UTC |
| Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/110823 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Link to SensusAccess
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5385-6254
Altmetric
Altmetric