Skip to main content
Kent Academic Repository

Who welcomes the bear: Evidence for a disconnect between attitudes and acceptability of killing brown bears

Rastgoo, Reyhane, Nayeri, Danial, Mohammadi, Alireza, Bath, Alistair J., Farhadinia, Mohammad S. (2025) Who welcomes the bear: Evidence for a disconnect between attitudes and acceptability of killing brown bears. People and Nature, 7 (9). pp. 2106-2118. ISSN 2575-8314. (doi:10.1002/pan3.70099) (KAR id:110823)

Abstract

Acceptability of large carnivores is influenced by socio-psychological factors and is crucial to coexistence. When large carnivores cause real or perceived threats such as damage to local economy or safety, people may engage in lethal control. However, in the presence of legal protection for the species and associated penalties, lethal retaliation can diminish or happen elusively. Therefore, it is helpful for managers to understand people's attitudes and acceptability associated with support for killing large carnivores in conflict situations and the demographics of those involved in lethal retaliation.

We interviewed 390 respondents living in 26 villages in northern Iran, where communities are largely dependent on agriculture and livestock for their livelihood and conflicts with brown bears (Ursus arctos) are common. Our goal was to assess the acceptability of killing bears in four different scenarios, from low-intensity to high-intensity interaction.

The results showed that although respondents generally had a slightly positive attitude towards bears, those with negative attitudes were associated with higher acceptability of killing bears. The mean acceptability of killing bears increased as human–bear interaction intensified. Younger, less educated and female respondents were more supportive of killing bears, while respondents with an alternative source of income were less accepting of killing them.

We provide five recommendations to foster coexistence, including leveraging positive attitudes through strategies like building advocacy networks, promoting inclusive outreach programmes, particularly for female and younger respondents. Also, we recommend emergency conflict mitigation teams take immediate action for conflict mitigation in areas with higher acceptance of killing bears to prevent retaliatory behaviour. Furthermore, providing an alternative source of income and focusing on preventive methods and effective strategies are recommended.

Item Type: Article
DOI/Identification number: 10.1002/pan3.70099
Uncontrolled keywords: attitudes; coexistence; human–wildlife conflict; lethal retaliation; mixed effect models; Potential for Conflict Index2; Ursus arctos
Subjects: G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > GN Anthropology
Institutional Unit: Schools > School of Natural Sciences > Conservation
Institutes > Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology
Former Institutional Unit:
There are no former institutional units.
Funders: UK Research and Innovation (https://ror.org/001aqnf71)
Depositing User: Mohammad Farhadinia
Date Deposited: 01 Aug 2025 14:07 UTC
Last Modified: 13 Oct 2025 13:19 UTC
Resource URI: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/110823 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)

University of Kent Author Information

Farhadinia, Mohammad S..

Creator's ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5385-6254
CReDIT Contributor Roles: Writing - original draft, Methodology, Writing - review and editing
  • Depositors only (login required):

Total unique views of this page since July 2020. For more details click on the image.