Hartrick, Olivia J., Turner, Rebecca K., Freethy, Alexander, Khatri, Chetan, Chong, Lauren, Wade, Ryckie G., Wormald, Justin C. R., Wiberg, Akira, Rodrigues, Jeremy N., Harrison, Conrad and others. (2025) Time to recovery following open and endoscopic carpal tunnel decompression: meta-analysis. BJS Open, 9 (4). Article Number zraf085. ISSN 2474-9842. (doi:10.1093/bjsopen/zraf085) (KAR id:110812)
|
PDF
Publisher pdf
Language: English
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
|
|
|
Download this file (PDF/660kB) |
Preview |
| Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader | |
| Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zraf085 |
|
Abstract
Background
Carpal tunnel release (CTR) can be performed using either an open or endoscopic approach. The patient recovery trajectories remain poorly understood. This study aimed to define and compare patient-reported recovery following unilateral open and endoscopic CTR.
Methods
A PRISMA-compliant, preregistered (CRD42023427718) systematic review was conducted, searching PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases on 4 July 2023 and 21 August 2024. Studies were included if they reported recovery data (patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)) at predefined time points for adults undergoing unilateral CTR. Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire and Quick Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores were extracted. Standardized mean change (SMC) scores from baseline were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. An innovative modification of the National Institutes of Health quality assessment tools was used to evaluate the risk of bias.
Results
In all, 49 studies were included (4546 participants included in the analysis; 3137 open CTR, 1409 endoscopic CTR). Both approaches improved PROM scores over 12 weeks, with early (4-week) outcomes strongly correlating (>0.89) with later (12-week) outcomes. Symptoms continued improving up to 104 weeks. At 1 week, open CTR showed symptomatic deterioration (SMC 10.29; 95% confidence interval (c.i.) 6.35 and 14.21 respectively), comparatively, endoscopic CTR demonstrated an improvement (SMC −2.83; 95% c.i. −7.80 and 2.14 respectively). By 2 weeks, symptom severity remained slightly worse in open CTR, but confidence intervals overlapped from week 3 and thereafter open CTR showed greater symptomatic improvement. Most studies had a high risk of bias and measured outcomes too infrequently for a granular comparison.
Conclusions
Patient-reported recovery trajectories for CTR can inform patient counselling and future research. Endoscopic CTR may result in fewer symptoms in the first 2 weeks, but open CTR may offer comparable or potentially greater improvement thereafter. Future trials with high-frequency PROM capture should prioritize early (first 3 weeks) and long-term (≥24 weeks) outcomes.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| DOI/Identification number: | 10.1093/bjsopen/zraf085 |
| Uncontrolled keywords: | Plastic surgery, Orthopaedics, Humans, Carpal Tunnel Syndrome, Endoscopy, Treatment Outcome, Decompression, Surgical, Recovery of Function, Time Factors, Patient Reported Outcome Measures |
| Subjects: | R Medicine |
| Institutional Unit: | Schools > School of Natural Sciences > Conservation |
| Former Institutional Unit: |
There are no former institutional units.
|
| Funders: | Natural Environment Research Council (https://ror.org/02b5d8509) |
| SWORD Depositor: | JISC Publications Router |
| Depositing User: | JISC Publications Router |
| Date Deposited: | 05 Sep 2025 14:32 UTC |
| Last Modified: | 17 Oct 2025 11:03 UTC |
| Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/110812 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Link to SensusAccess
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5159-8266
Altmetric
Altmetric