Vigneron, Sophie (2025) Authentic v fake: A critique of the law’s approach to authenticity. In: Vigneron, Sophie and Janet, Ulph and Antoinette, Maget Dominice, eds. Research Handbook on Art, Culture and Heritage Law. Edward Elgar, UK. (Submitted) (Access to this publication is currently restricted. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided) (KAR id:110200)
|
PDF
Author's Accepted Manuscript
Language: English Restricted to Repository staff only |
|
|
Contact us about this publication
|
|
Abstract
This chapter analyses the concept of authenticity and assesses its significance. In carrying out this examination, it explores the two aspects of authenticity: materiality (material used, shape, function) and non-materiality (the relationship of the object with people) that John Merryman called ‘cultural truth’. It explores the importance of cultural truth and how it has been recognised in different disciplines and how it lies at the heart of our understanding of authenticity. It will then contrast this approach with the legal discipline. Law balances different interests in its assessment of authenticity; often claims will be unsuccessful because they are ruled by general principles of contract law, evidence or criminal law that do not take into consideration the cultural truth of an object.
| Item Type: | Book section |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled keywords: | authenticity, fake, cultural value, cultural heritage, law |
| Subjects: | K Law |
| Institutional Unit: | Schools > Kent Law School |
| Former Institutional Unit: |
There are no former institutional units.
|
| Depositing User: | Sophie Vigneron |
| Date Deposited: | 11 Jun 2025 15:25 UTC |
| Last Modified: | 18 Jun 2025 07:36 UTC |
| Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/110200 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8667-4406
Total Views
Total Views