Rodda, Joanne, Kuchenbecker, Lindsey A, Borelli, Wyllians V, DeMarco, Mari L, Castilhos, Raphael M, Cawston, Erin E, Chabrashvili, Tinatin, Budelier, Melissa M, Duran-Aniotz, Claudia, Udeh-Momoh, Chinedu, and others. (2025) Global multi-specialty clinician perspectives on the implementation of Alzheimer's disease blood biomarkers. Alzheimer's & Dementia, 21 (5). Article Number e70201. ISSN 1552-5279. (doi:10.1002/alz.70201) (KAR id:110170)
|
PDF
Publisher pdf
Language: English
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
|
|
|
Download this file (PDF/1MB) |
Preview |
| Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader | |
| Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.70201 |
|
Abstract
Clinicians' views on the clinical readiness of Alzheimer's disease (AD) blood biomarkers (BBMs) are not well understood. The Alzheimer's Association International Society to Advance Alzheimer's Research and Treatment Biofluid-Based Biomarkers Professional Interest Area conducted a survey to elicit clinician opinions on AD BBM implementation, including contexts of use, assay selection, reporting, and result interpretation. Clinician respondents (n = 212) practiced in Europe (56%), North America (24%), the Caribbean and Central/South America (11%), and other continents (9%). Most respondents were medical doctors (80%) practicing in secondary or tertiary care (88%). For 56%, cerebrospinal fluid AD biomarkers or amyloid positron emission tomography were accessible, but 48% agreed and 52% disagreed with the implementation of AD BBMs in any clinical context. Respondents emphasized the need for data from diverse populations and educational resources to support test interpretation. Surveyed clinicians generally agreed with published appropriate use recommendations but were divided on AD BBM readiness for clinical use. A survey of clinicians was conducted regarding clinical readiness of Alzheimer's disease (AD) blood biomarkers (BBMs). Views were split on AD BBM clinical readiness: 48% agreed, 52% disagreed. Most responders supported AD BBM use for treatment decisions. Most responders opposed AD BBM testing in asymptomatic individuals. Test performance data and educational materials to aid interpretation were of high importance.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| DOI/Identification number: | 10.1002/alz.70201 |
| Uncontrolled keywords: | biomarker, Humans, Surveys and Questionnaires, Male, diagnosis, Attitude of Health Personnel, Alzheimer Disease - blood - diagnosis, Biomarkers - blood, secondary care, blood biomarkers, primary care, cognitive impairment, clinical implementation, Alzheimer's disease, Female, Physicians |
| Subjects: | R Medicine |
| Institutional Unit: | Schools > Kent and Medway Medical School |
| Former Institutional Unit: |
There are no former institutional units.
|
| Funders: | University of Kent (https://ror.org/00xkeyj56) |
| SWORD Depositor: | JISC Publications Router |
| Depositing User: | JISC Publications Router |
| Date Deposited: | 17 Jun 2025 08:57 UTC |
| Last Modified: | 22 Jul 2025 09:23 UTC |
| Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/110170 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Link to SensusAccess
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):

Altmetric
Altmetric