Weekes, Cassidy J., Storey, Jennifer E., Pina, Afroditi (2025) Cyberstalking Perpetrators and Their Methods: A Systematic Literature Review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, . ISSN 1524-8380. E-ISSN 1552-8324. (doi:10.1177/15248380251333411) (KAR id:109765)
|
PDF
Publisher pdf
Language: English
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
|
|
|
Download this file (PDF/548kB) |
Preview |
| Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader | |
| Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380251333411 |
|
Abstract
The existing body of research on cyberstalking has identified the prevalent nature of this behavior, and the detrimental impact that cyberstalking has on victims and society. This systematic review aims to summarize literature on the perpetration of cyberstalking with two research questions: (a) Who are the perpetrators of cyberstalking? and (b) What are the methods of cyberstalking? Two literature databases (SCOPUS and Web of Science) were searched for empirical research or literature reviews examining cyberstalking perpetration and/or methods. Following screening, 80 articles were identified and rated as highly relevant based on their applicability to the research questions. Perpetrators of cyberstalking were found to lack social skills, have low self-control, have experienced physical abuse victimization, endorsed stalking-related attitudes, and have higher rates of Internet use. Perpetrators were motivated by trying to reconcile a relationship, exact revenge, seek a relationship, or establish control over the victim. The most commonly reported methods of cyberstalking were unwanted and repeated online contact through email, social media, or text message. Other methods of cyberstalking include accessing the victim’s accounts, tracking their GPS location, posing as the victim online, or contacting friends/family of the victim. The findings of this review highlight precursors to, and patterns of, cyberstalking perpetration, and future research is required to explore how existing “offline” stalking risk assessments and typologies can be applied to cases of cyberstalking, which would allow authorities to develop effective case management strategies.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| DOI/Identification number: | 10.1177/15248380251333411 |
| Uncontrolled keywords: | cyberstalking, stalking, technology-facilitated abuse, systematic review, digital violence, perpetration |
| Subjects: | B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology |
| Institutional Unit: | Schools > School of Psychology > Psychology |
| Former Institutional Unit: |
Divisions > Division of Human and Social Sciences > School of Psychology
|
| Funders: | University of Kent (https://ror.org/00xkeyj56) |
| Depositing User: | Cassidy Weekes |
| Date Deposited: | 25 Apr 2025 10:46 UTC |
| Last Modified: | 22 Jul 2025 09:22 UTC |
| Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/109765 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Link to SensusAccess
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):

https://orcid.org/0009-0007-7758-1375
Altmetric
Altmetric