Skip to main content
Kent Academic Repository

Cyberstalking Perpetrators and Their Methods: A Systematic Literature Review

Weekes, Cassidy J., Storey, Jennifer E., Pina, Afroditi (2025) Cyberstalking Perpetrators and Their Methods: A Systematic Literature Review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, . ISSN 1524-8380. E-ISSN 1552-8324. (doi:10.1177/15248380251333411) (KAR id:109765)

Abstract

The existing body of research on cyberstalking has identified the prevalent nature of this behavior, and the detrimental impact that cyberstalking has on victims and society. This systematic review aims to summarize literature on the perpetration of cyberstalking with two research questions: (a) Who are the perpetrators of cyberstalking? and (b) What are the methods of cyberstalking? Two literature databases (SCOPUS and Web of Science) were searched for empirical research or literature reviews examining cyberstalking perpetration and/or methods. Following screening, 80 articles were identified and rated as highly relevant based on their applicability to the research questions. Perpetrators of cyberstalking were found to lack social skills, have low self-control, have experienced physical abuse victimization, endorsed stalking-related attitudes, and have higher rates of Internet use. Perpetrators were motivated by trying to reconcile a relationship, exact revenge, seek a relationship, or establish control over the victim. The most commonly reported methods of cyberstalking were unwanted and repeated online contact through email, social media, or text message. Other methods of cyberstalking include accessing the victim’s accounts, tracking their GPS location, posing as the victim online, or contacting friends/family of the victim. The findings of this review highlight precursors to, and patterns of, cyberstalking perpetration, and future research is required to explore how existing “offline” stalking risk assessments and typologies can be applied to cases of cyberstalking, which would allow authorities to develop effective case management strategies.

Item Type: Article
DOI/Identification number: 10.1177/15248380251333411
Uncontrolled keywords: cyberstalking, stalking, technology-facilitated abuse, systematic review, digital violence, perpetration
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Institutional Unit: Schools > School of Psychology > Psychology
Former Institutional Unit:
Divisions > Division of Human and Social Sciences > School of Psychology
Funders: University of Kent (https://ror.org/00xkeyj56)
Depositing User: Cassidy Weekes
Date Deposited: 25 Apr 2025 10:46 UTC
Last Modified: 22 Jul 2025 09:22 UTC
Resource URI: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/109765 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)

University of Kent Author Information

  • Depositors only (login required):

Total unique views of this page since July 2020. For more details click on the image.