Polack, Sarah, Bell, Georgia, Silarova, Barbora, Hebditch, Molly, Tingle, Alison, Sommerlad, Andrew, Portacolone, Elena, Sykes, Kath, Tabet, Naji (2025) Non-Pharmacological Interventions for People With Dementia Who Live Alone: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 40 (3). Article Number e70059. ISSN 0885-6230. E-ISSN 1099-1166. (doi:10.1002/gps.70059) (KAR id:109100)
PDF
Publisher pdf
Language: English
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
|
|
Download this file (PDF/1MB) |
Preview |
Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader | |
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.70059 |
Abstract
OBJECTIVES
Approximately one third of people with dementia live on their own and they face an increased risk of unmet needs and loneliness. This systematic review aimed to identify and describe non-pharmacological interventions that have been evaluated for people with dementia living alone and to examine the effectiveness of these interventions.
METHODS
Following PRISMA guidelines, six databases were systematically searched: MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Social Care online, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Studies that reported on the impact or experience of an intervention for people with dementia living alone in the community (not long-term care) and that had been published since 2000 were included in the review. No restrictions were applied in terms of study design or outcome measures. Study risk of bias was assessed, and a narrative approach was used to synthesize findings.
RESULTS
Thirteen studies of 13 different interventions were included, grouped into five intervention categories: home-based dementia case/care management (n = 4), technology (n = 3), social (n = 3), cognitive (n = 2) and psychological (n = 1). There was one randomized controlled trial (RCT), and two economic evaluations that used data from RCTs. Most other studies were small-scale, and only two were evaluated to have low risk of bias. Most studies reported positive or mixed findings in terms of the intervention's impact on the person with dementia or aspects of feasibility. However, studies were heterogeneous in terms of intervention, study design, and outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS
This review of a limited body of research highlights the potential for interventions to support people with dementia who live alone. It also identifies key evidence gaps and the need for more robust and comparable research to better understand what works, why, for who, and how. Involving people with dementia who live alone in the design, implementation, and evaluation of these interventions will be crucial to ensure that their needs and preferences are met.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
DOI/Identification number: | 10.1002/gps.70059 |
Uncontrolled keywords: | dementia, interventions, living alone |
Subjects: | H Social Sciences > HV Social pathology. Social and public welfare |
Divisions: | Divisions > Division for the Study of Law, Society and Social Justice > School of Social Policy, Sociology and Social Research > Centre for Health Services Studies |
Funders: | National Institute for Health Research (https://ror.org/0187kwz08) |
Depositing User: | Barbora Silarova |
Date Deposited: | 11 Mar 2025 10:02 UTC |
Last Modified: | 26 Mar 2025 03:59 UTC |
Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/109100 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Link to SensusAccess
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):