Skip to main content
Kent Academic Repository

Pangolin hunting in Southeast Nigeria is motivated more by local meat consumption than international demand for scales

Emogor, A. Emogor, Wasser, Samuel K., Coad, Lauren, Balmford, Ben, Ingram, Daniel J., Wijesinghe, Amayaa, Atsu, Benedict A., Bassey, Frederick, Ogu, Dominic S., Okafor, Ngozi, and others. (2025) Pangolin hunting in Southeast Nigeria is motivated more by local meat consumption than international demand for scales. Nature Ecology and Evolution, 9 (1358). p. 1349. E-ISSN 2397-334X. (doi:10.1038/s41559-025-02734-3) (KAR id:108752)

PDF Publisher pdf
Language: English


Download this file
(PDF/3MB)
[thumbnail of Ingram_Pangolin_hunting.pdf]
Preview
Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader
PDF Author's Accepted Manuscript
Language: English

Restricted to Repository staff only
Contact us about this publication
[thumbnail of Pangolin-paper_Emogor-et-al_Accepted-version.pdf]
PDF Supplemental Material
Language: English

Restricted to Repository staff only
Contact us about this publication
[thumbnail of Supplementary_material-Emogor-et-al.pdf]
Official URL:
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-025-02734-3

Abstract

Thousands of species are threatened by overexploitation, often driven by a complex interplay of local and global demand for various products—a dynamic frequently overlooked in wildlife trade policies. African pangolins, regarded as the world’s most trafficked wild mammals, are a heavily exploited group for different reasons across geographic scales. However, it remains unclear how far the burgeoning trafficking of their scales to Asia for medicine drives their exploitation compared with local meat demand. Here, using data collected from questionnaires distributed to 809 hunters and meat vendors in Nigeria, the world’s biggest hub for pangolin trafficking, we show that targeted pangolin hunts are uncommon in the country’s largest pangolin stronghold. Instead, 97% of pangolins are captured opportunistically or during general hunting, with 98% of these caught for meat and mostly either eaten by hunters (71%) or traded locally (27%), potentially due to the meat’s exceptionally high palatability. Meanwhile, around 70% of scales are discarded, with less than 30% sold. In addition, local meat prices are three to four times higher than those for scales. Our findings highlight the need to consider entire wildlife trade chains in international policies.

Item Type: Article
DOI/Identification number: 10.1038/s41559-025-02734-3
Additional information: For the purpose of open access, the author has applied a CC BY public copyright licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising from this submission.
Subjects: G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation
G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > GE Environmental Sciences
Institutional Unit: Schools > School of Natural Sciences > Conservation
Institutes > Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology
Former Institutional Unit:
Divisions > Division of Human and Social Sciences > School of Anthropology and Conservation > DICE (Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology)
Funders: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (https://ror.org/0456r8d26)
UK Research and Innovation (https://ror.org/001aqnf71)
Depositing User: Daniel Ingram
Date Deposited: 18 Feb 2025 14:16 UTC
Last Modified: 15 Oct 2025 02:48 UTC
Resource URI: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/108752 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)

University of Kent Author Information

  • Depositors only (login required):

Total unique views of this page since July 2020. For more details click on the image.