Emogor, A. Emogor, Wasser, Samuel K., Coad, Lauren, Balmford, Ben, Ingram, Daniel J., Wijesinghe, Amayaa, Atsu, Benedict A., Bassey, Frederick, Ogu, Dominic S., Okafor, Ngozi, and others. (2025) Pangolin hunting in Southeast Nigeria is motivated more by local meat consumption than international demand for scales. Nature Ecology and Evolution, 9 (1358). p. 1349. E-ISSN 2397-334X. (doi:10.1038/s41559-025-02734-3) (KAR id:108752)
|
PDF
Publisher pdf
Language: English
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
|
|
|
Download this file (PDF/3MB) |
Preview |
| Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader | |
|
PDF
Author's Accepted Manuscript
Language: English Restricted to Repository staff only |
|
|
Contact us about this publication
|
|
|
PDF
Supplemental Material
Language: English Restricted to Repository staff only |
|
|
Contact us about this publication
|
|
| Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-025-02734-3 |
|
Abstract
Thousands of species are threatened by overexploitation, often driven by a complex interplay of local and global demand for various products—a dynamic frequently overlooked in wildlife trade policies. African pangolins, regarded as the world’s most trafficked wild mammals, are a heavily exploited group for different reasons across geographic scales. However, it remains unclear how far the burgeoning trafficking of their scales to Asia for medicine drives their exploitation compared with local meat demand. Here, using data collected from questionnaires distributed to 809 hunters and meat vendors in Nigeria, the world’s biggest hub for pangolin trafficking, we show that targeted pangolin hunts are uncommon in the country’s largest pangolin stronghold. Instead, 97% of pangolins are captured opportunistically or during general hunting, with 98% of these caught for meat and mostly either eaten by hunters (71%) or traded locally (27%), potentially due to the meat’s exceptionally high palatability. Meanwhile, around 70% of scales are discarded, with less than 30% sold. In addition, local meat prices are three to four times higher than those for scales. Our findings highlight the need to consider entire wildlife trade chains in international policies.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| DOI/Identification number: | 10.1038/s41559-025-02734-3 |
| Additional information: | For the purpose of open access, the author has applied a CC BY public copyright licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising from this submission. |
| Subjects: |
G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > GE Environmental Sciences |
| Institutional Unit: |
Schools > School of Natural Sciences > Conservation Institutes > Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology |
| Former Institutional Unit: |
Divisions > Division of Human and Social Sciences > School of Anthropology and Conservation > DICE (Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology)
|
| Funders: |
Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (https://ror.org/0456r8d26)
UK Research and Innovation (https://ror.org/001aqnf71) |
| Depositing User: | Daniel Ingram |
| Date Deposited: | 18 Feb 2025 14:16 UTC |
| Last Modified: | 15 Oct 2025 02:48 UTC |
| Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/108752 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Link to SensusAccess
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5843-220X
Altmetric
Altmetric