Payne, Christopher, Smith, Samuel A., Sappal, Ashleen, Boorgula, Rushil, Taylor, Katrina Ann (2025) Are e-scooters active transport? Measured physical activity outputs of e-scooter riding vs walking. Journal of Transport and Health, 41 . ISSN 2214-1405. E-ISSN 2214-1413. (doi:10.1016/j.jth.2024.101963) (KAR id:108118)
PDF
Publisher pdf
Language: English
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
|
|
Download this file (PDF/3MB) |
Preview |
Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader | |
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2024.101963 |
Abstract
Introduction: E-scooters have been adopted into the urban transportation network as a convenient, environmentally friendly, and low-cost mode of transportation intended to reduce vehicle dependence over short distances. However, there is a concern that e-scooters displace active modes of transport such as walking and therefore have the potential to negatively impact physical activity (PA), health and well-being. Currently, limited evidence exists to accurately quantify energy expenditure, and physiological and psychological responses to an acute bout of e-scooter riding.
Methods: This study compared a 15-minute bout of e-scooter riding to time-matched resting and walking conditions using a randomised crossover trial conducted in a controlled laboratory setting. The resting condition was performed in a supine position, and both e-scooter and walking were performed on a motorised treadmill. Cardiorespiratory measures were recorded for each condition using online gas analysis, and the metabolic equivalent of task (MET) minutes were used to determine energy expenditure. Subjective experience was also measured post-walking and e-scooter conditions.
Results: 15 minutes of walking yielded significantly greater MET minutes (55 ± 7 MET-min) compared to both resting (15 ± 4 MET-min, P < 0.001, d = 7.38) and e-scooter (24 ± 6 MET-min, P < 0.001, d = 5.18) conditions. Psychological well-being was significantly greater (P < 0.001, d = 0.648) following walking (19.2 ± 4.1) compared to e-scooter (17.1 ± 4.5). Psychological distress (P = 0.40) was significantly lower post-walking (5.0 ± 1.8) compared to e-scooter (5.8 ± 2.6).
Conclusion: In a controlled laboratory environment, riding an e-scooter resulted in significantly less energy expenditure and elicited an unfavourable psychological response compared to walking. Regular e-scooter use could displace PA participation and increase physical inactivity with resultant negative health consequences. PA engagement and health guidelines should be considered in the strategic development of electric micro-mobility transportation.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
DOI/Identification number: | 10.1016/j.jth.2024.101963 |
Uncontrolled keywords: | E-scooters; walking; physical activity; energy expenditure; active transport; electric micro-mobility |
Subjects: |
G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > GV Recreation. Leisure G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > GV Recreation. Leisure > Sports sciences |
Divisions: | Divisions > Division of Natural Sciences > Sport and Exercise Sciences |
Funders: | University of Kent (https://ror.org/00xkeyj56) |
Depositing User: | Samuel Smith |
Date Deposited: | 09 Dec 2024 13:59 UTC |
Last Modified: | 10 Dec 2024 12:21 UTC |
Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/108118 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Link to SensusAccess
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):