Skip to main content
Kent Academic Repository

Policy formulation and actor roles in the expanded Kenyan free maternity policy (Linda Mama): A policy analysis

Oyugi, Boniface, Audi-Poquillon, Zilper, Kendall, Sally, Peckham, Stephen, Barasa, Edwine (2024) Policy formulation and actor roles in the expanded Kenyan free maternity policy (Linda Mama): A policy analysis. PLOS Global Public Health, 4 (11). Article Number e0002796. ISSN 2767-3375. (doi:10.1371/journal.pgph.0002796) (KAR id:107883)

PDF Publisher pdf
Language: English


Download this file
(PDF/2MB)
[thumbnail of B. Oyugi - Policy formulation and actor roles in the expanded kenyan free maternity policy - PPDF.pdf]
Preview
Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader
Official URL:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0002796

Abstract

In 2013, Kenya implemented free maternity services, later expanded in 2016 into the ‘Linda Mama’ policy to provide essential health services for pregnant women. This study explored the policy formulation background, processes, content, and actors’ roles in formulation and implementation. Using a convergent parallel mixed-methods case study design, we reviewed documents and conducted in-depth interviews with national stakeholders, county officials, and healthcare workers. We applied a theoretical framework capturing the background and context, processes, content, and actors. The study spanned national, county, and facility levels within Kenya’s health system. Data were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using a framework thematic approach. Findings showed that political imperatives and global and national goals shaped the expanded policy, drawing on previous learnings. Actor power played a crucial role in shaping policy direction, reflecting their interests and capacity to influence decisions. The policy aimed to improve coverage and administrative efficiency, with NHIF becoming the primary purchaser of services to ensure sustainability and address legal challenges. The policy design, marked by conflicts and time pressures, required a collaborative approach to reconcile design and costing differences. Despite differing interests, discussions and dialogues were essential for leadership and conflict management, culminating in key policy documents. A committee was established for stakeholders to freely discuss and debate the policy design, enabling relevant players to devise solutions and fostering joint commitment for implementation. Government officials, development partners, and representatives significantly influenced policy formulation. Beneficiary representatives had limited awareness of public participation opportunities. National and county actors supported achieving audit, research, financing, and strategic operational goals crucial for policy implementation. In conclusion, this study highlights the continued significance of policy analysis frameworks and theories in understanding the complex nature of policy development. These findings offer valuable insights for countries designing or redesigning healthcare policies and provide relevant information to academic communities.

Item Type: Article
DOI/Identification number: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002796
Subjects: H Social Sciences
Divisions: Divisions > Division for the Study of Law, Society and Social Justice > School of Social Policy, Sociology and Social Research > Centre for Health Services Studies
Funders: Commonwealth Scholarship Commission (https://ror.org/051x4wh35)
Economic and Social Research Council (https://ror.org/03n0ht308)
SWORD Depositor: JISC Publications Router
Depositing User: JISC Publications Router
Date Deposited: 22 Nov 2024 15:08 UTC
Last Modified: 25 Nov 2024 15:17 UTC
Resource URI: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/107883 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)

University of Kent Author Information

Oyugi, Boniface.

Creator's ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9550-9138
CReDIT Contributor Roles: Investigation (Equal), Formal analysis (Equal), Validation (Equal), Resources (Equal), Visualisation (Equal), Conceptualisation (Equal), Funding acquisition (Equal), Methodology (Equal), Project administration (Equal), Software (Equal), Data curation (Equal), Writing - review and editing (Equal), Writing - original draft (Equal)

Kendall, Sally.

Creator's ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2507-0350
CReDIT Contributor Roles: Supervision, Conceptualisation, Writing - review and editing

Peckham, Stephen.

Creator's ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7002-2614
CReDIT Contributor Roles: Writing - review and editing, Supervision, Conceptualisation
  • Depositors only (login required):

Total unique views of this page since July 2020. For more details click on the image.