Caiels, James, Rand, Stacey, Mikelyte, Rasa, Webster, Lucy, Field, Elizabeth, Towers, Ann-Marie (2024) Enhancing quality of life measurement: adapting the ASCOT easy read for older adults accessing social care. Quality of Life Research, . ISSN 0962-9343. (doi:10.1007/s11136-024-03791-0) (KAR id:107362)
PDF
Publisher pdf
Language: English
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
|
|
Download this file (PDF/858kB) |
Preview |
Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader | |
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-024-03791-0 |
Abstract
Purpose
This study aimed to adapt and assess the content validity of the ASCOT Easy Read (ASCOT-ER) for older people accessing social care.
Methods
A co-production working group of 8 older social care users and their supporters was established to evaluate the comprehensibility and relevance of the ASCOT-ER images, wording and layout. Changes made by the working group were iteratively tested using cognitive interviewing techniques (think aloud) with 25 older social care users not able to self-complete the original ASCOT.
Results
Co-research with people with dementia and their supporters was critical to the development of an effective and accessible tool. Issues identified with comprehension, recall, judgement and response were addressed through iterative adjustments to design, layout and wording. An unexpected finding was that illustrations were disliked or disregarded by the majority of people, and, in particular, those living with dementia. This result contrasts with the typical assumption of easy read approaches, where illustrations are expected to enhance comprehension.
Conclusion
The ASCOT-ER measure for older people is suitable for older people using social care services with mild to moderate dementia, mild cognitive impairment and other age-related needs. The revisions applied were designed to improve comprehension, judgement and response for this group and even those who were most cognitively impaired experienced fewer issues by the final round of testing. Nonetheless, some prompting was still required, particularly for those with higher levels of cognitive impairment and it is likely that some respondents will require the questionnaire to be administered in an interview format.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
DOI/Identification number: | 10.1007/s11136-024-03791-0 |
Subjects: | H Social Sciences > HV Social pathology. Social and public welfare |
Divisions: |
Divisions > Division for the Study of Law, Society and Social Justice > School of Social Policy, Sociology and Social Research > Personal Social Services Research Unit Divisions > Division for the Study of Law, Society and Social Justice > School of Social Policy, Sociology and Social Research > Centre for Health Services Studies |
Funders: | National Institute for Health Research (https://ror.org/0187kwz08) |
Depositing User: | Stacey Rand |
Date Deposited: | 27 Sep 2024 10:36 UTC |
Last Modified: | 30 Sep 2024 11:14 UTC |
Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/107362 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Link to SensusAccess
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):