König, Philipp, Eichhorn, Julia Maria, Suparman, Eloy, Bückreiß, Nico, Cinatl, Jindrich, Michaelis, Martin, Bendas, Gerd (2024) SLFN11 and ATR as targets for overcoming cisplatin resistance in ovarian cancer cells. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Basis of Disease, 1870 (8). Article Number 167448. ISSN 0925-4439. E-ISSN 1879-260X. (doi:10.1016/j.bbadis.2024.167448) (KAR id:106828)
PDF
Publisher pdf
Language: English
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
|
|
Download this file (PDF/4MB) |
Preview |
Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader | |
PDF
Author's Accepted Manuscript
Language: English Restricted to Repository staff only |
|
Contact us about this Publication
|
|
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbadis.2024.167448 |
Abstract
The levels and activities of the DNA/RNA helicase schlafen11 (SLFN11) and the serine/threonine-protein kinase ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related protein (ATR) may determine cancer cell sensitivity to DNA damaging agents, including platinum drugs. Here, we studied the roles of SLFN11 and ATR in cisplatin resistance of ovarian cancer using cell lines displaying acquired or intrinsic cisplatin resistance. W1CR, the cisplatin-resistant subline of W1 ovarian cancer cells, displayed reduced SLFN11 levels. HDAC inhibition using entinostat returned an epigenetic downregulation of SLFN11 in W1CR cells, caused SLFN11 re-expression and re-sensitized these cells to cisplatin. Moreover, entinostat also sensitized intrinsically resistant EFO21 ovarian cancer cells to cisplatin by upregulating SLFN11. However, SLFN11 was not involved in cisplatin resistance in all other cell models. Thus, SLFN11 expression is not a general cisplatin resistance marker in ovarian cancer. In contrast, inhibition of the DNA damage repair master regulator ATR using sub-toxic concentrations of elimusertib sensitized parental cell lines as well as intrinsically resistant EFO21 cells to cisplatin, and fully reversed acquired cisplatin resistance in cisplatin-adapted sublines W1CR, A2780cis, and KuramochirCDDP2000. Mechanisms underlying ATR-mediated cisplatin resistance differed between the cell lines and included CHK1/WEE1 signaling and induction of homologous recombination. In conclusion, SLFN11 and ATR are involved in ovarian cancer cisplatin resistance. Although our data identify ATR as key target for tackling cisplatin resistance in ovarian cancer, future studies are needed to identify biomarkers that indicate, which individual ovarian cancers benefit from SLFN11 re-activation and/or ATR inhibition.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
DOI/Identification number: | 10.1016/j.bbadis.2024.167448 |
Uncontrolled keywords: | Chemoresistance; DNA repair; Epigenetics; Novel therapeutics; Ovarian cancer |
Subjects: |
R Medicine > RC Internal medicine > RC254 Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology R Medicine > RM Therapeutics. Pharmacology |
Divisions: | Divisions > Division of Natural Sciences > Biosciences |
Depositing User: | Martin Michaelis |
Date Deposited: | 08 Aug 2024 14:52 UTC |
Last Modified: | 22 Aug 2024 13:55 UTC |
Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/106828 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Link to SensusAccess
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):