Tanney, Julia (2009) Real Rules. Synthese, 171 (3). pp. 499-507. ISSN 0039-7857. E-ISSN 1573-0964. (doi:10.1007/s11229-008-9326-6) (The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided) (KAR id:10590)
The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided. | |
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11229-008-9326-6 |
Abstract
Crispin Wright has for many years expressed frustration at Wittgenstein’s ‘quietism’ —his refusal to offer substantive answers to the metaphysical and epistemological problems that are raised, Wright alleges, by Wittgenstein’s own reflections on rules. In a recent paper Wright suggests this quietism can be explained by Wittgenstein’s rejection of a picture that seems to indicate Platonism and communitarianism as the only available solutions to these ostensible metaphysical and epistemological problems. I agree with Wright that Wittgenstein would reject the initial assumptions that pit the realist against the communitarian, but I tell my own story on behalf of Wittgenstein about what is wrong with the altogether misconceived picture that generates the dilemma.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
DOI/Identification number: | 10.1007/s11229-008-9326-6 |
Uncontrolled keywords: | Communitarianism · Language-games · Normativity · Platonism · Realism · Rule-following · Ryle · Wittgenstein |
Subjects: | B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion |
Divisions: | Divisions > Division of Arts and Humanities > School of Culture and Languages |
Depositing User: | Julia Tanney |
Date Deposited: | 20 Mar 2009 15:22 UTC |
Last Modified: | 05 Nov 2024 09:43 UTC |
Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/10590 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):