Sykes, Rachel E., O'Neill, Helen M.K., Juffe-Bignoli, Diego, Metcalfe, Kristian, Stephenson, P.J., Struebig, Matthew J., Visconti, Piero, Burgess, Neil D., Kingston, Naomi, Davies, Zoe G., and others. (2024) Developing a framework to improve global estimates of conservation area coverage. Oryx, 58 (2). pp. 192-201. ISSN 0030-6053. E-ISSN 1365-3008. (doi:10.1017/S0030605323000625) (KAR id:105673)
PDF
Publisher pdf
Language: English
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
|
|
Download this file (PDF/714kB) |
Preview |
Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader | |
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605323000625 |
Abstract
Area-based conservation is a widely used approach for maintaining biodiversity, and there are ongoing discussions over what is an appropriate global conservation area coverage target. To inform such debates, it is necessary to know the extent and ecological representativeness of the current conservation area network, but this is hampered by gaps in existing global datasets. In particular, although data on privately and community-governed protected areas and other effective area-based conservation measures are often available at the national level, it can take many years to incorporate these into official datasets. This suggests a complementary approach is needed based on selecting a sample of countries and using their national-scale datasets to produce more accurate metrics. However, every country added to the sample increases the costs of data collection, collation and analysis. To address this, here we present a data collection framework underpinned by a spatial prioritization algorithm, which identifies a minimum set of countries that are also representative of 10 factors that influence conservation area establishment and biodiversity patterns. We then illustrate this approach by identifying a representative set of sampling units that cover 10% of the terrestrial realm, which included areas in only 25 countries. In contrast, selecting 10% of the terrestrial realm at random included areas across a mean of 162 countries. These sampling units could be the focus of future data collation on different types of conservation area. Analysing these data could produce more rapid and accurate estimates of global conservation area coverage and ecological representativeness, complementing existing international reporting systems.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
DOI/Identification number: | 10.1017/S0030605323000625 |
Projects: | Trade, Development and the Environment Hub project (project number ES/S008160/1) |
Uncontrolled keywords: | conservation areas; conservation targets; Global Biodiversity Framework Target 3; OECM; other effective area-based conservation measures; protected areas |
Subjects: | Q Science > QH Natural history > QH75 Conservation (Biology) |
Divisions: | Divisions > Division of Human and Social Sciences > School of Anthropology and Conservation > DICE (Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology) |
Funders: | UK Research and Innovation (https://ror.org/001aqnf71) |
Depositing User: | Bob Smith |
Date Deposited: | 06 May 2024 11:22 UTC |
Last Modified: | 05 Nov 2024 13:11 UTC |
Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/105673 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Link to SensusAccess
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):