Skip to main content
Kent Academic Repository

Punishing women for miscarriage: The role of political orientation and hostile sexism

Chalmers, Jocelyn K., Woodford, Leif, Sutton, Robbie M. (2024) Punishing women for miscarriage: The role of political orientation and hostile sexism. Sex Roles, 90 (5). pp. 613-627. ISSN 0360-0025. (doi:10.1007/s11199-024-01467-0) (KAR id:105324)

Abstract

Women’s reproductive autonomy is an ideologically divisive issue, and this divisiveness goes beyond just attitudes toward abortion to include other outcomes such as miscarriage. Previous research has established that hostile sexism is positively associated with punitive attitudes toward pregnant women who flout conventional pregnancy proscriptions. Across three studies (N1 = 296; N2 = 580, N3 = 308) we conceptually replicated this research while shifting the focus from abstract attitudes to concrete policies punishing women for miscarriage, and moving beyond hostile sexism to examine the role of political orientation (including libertarianism). In all three studies, hostile sexism remained a significant positive predictor of support for punishing women for miscarriage even after controlling for political orientation. Conservative and libertarian self-identification were positively associated with support for punishment at zero-order, and in multiple regressions adjusting for sexism and demographic variables, conservatism remained significantly positively related to support for punishment in two studies. Libertarianism was no longer a significant predictor of support for punishment after adjusting for sexism; with this in mind, we conducted mediation analyses and found significant indirect paths from libertarian identification through hostile sexism in two of the three studies. These findings provide evidence for the role of sexism and political ideology in the increasingly punitive post-Roe vs. Wade United States.

Item Type: Article
DOI/Identification number: 10.1007/s11199-024-01467-0
Uncontrolled keywords: miscarriage; punishment; conservatism; libertarianism; sexism; reproduction
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
K Law
R Medicine > RG Gynecology and obstetrics > RG551 Pregnancy
Divisions: Divisions > Division of Human and Social Sciences > School of Psychology
Funders: University of Kent (https://ror.org/00xkeyj56)
Depositing User: Robbie Sutton
Date Deposited: 14 Mar 2024 13:36 UTC
Last Modified: 29 May 2024 10:06 UTC
Resource URI: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/105324 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)

University of Kent Author Information

  • Depositors only (login required):

Total unique views for this document in KAR since July 2020. For more details click on the image.