Skip to main content
Kent Academic Repository

Barriers and facilitators to use of digital health tools by healthcare practitioners and their patients, before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a multimethods study

Turnbull, Sophie Louise, Dack, Charlotte, Lei, Jiedi, Aksu, Irem, Grant, Sabrina, Lasseter, Gemma, Silarova, Barbora, Ainsworth, Ben (2024) Barriers and facilitators to use of digital health tools by healthcare practitioners and their patients, before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a multimethods study. BMJ Open, 14 (3). Article Number e080055. ISSN 2044-6055. (doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080055) (KAR id:105309)

Abstract

Objectives: To explore how healthcare practitioners (HCPs) made decisions about the implementation of digital health technologies (DHTs) in their clinical practice before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Design: A multimethods study, comprising semistructured interviews conducted prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, supplemented with an online survey that was conducted during the pandemic with a different sample, to ensure the qualitative findings remained relevant within the rapidly changing healthcare context. Participants were recruited through HCP networks, snowballing and social media. Data were analysed thematically. Setting: Phone interviews and online survey. Participants: HCPs represented a range of professions from primary and secondary care across England, with varied socioeconomic deprivation. Results: 24 HCPs were interviewed, and 16 HCPs responded to the survey. In the interviews, HCPs described three levels where decisions were made, which determined who would have access to what DHTs: health organisation, HCP and patient levels. These decisions resulted in the unequal implementation of DHTs across health services, created barriers for HCPs using DHTs in their practice and influenced HCPs’ decisions on which patients to supply DHTs with. In the survey, HCPs described being provided support to overcome some of the barriers at the organisation and HCP level during the pandemic. However, they cited similar concerns to pre-pandemic about barriers patients faced using DHTs (eg, digital literacy). In the absence of centralised guidance on how to manage these barriers, health services made their own decisions about how to adapt their services for those who struggled with DHTs. Conclusions: Decision-making at the health organisation, HCP and patient levels influences inequalities in access to DHTs for HCPs and patients. The mobilisation of centralised information and resources during the pandemic can be viewed as good practice for reducing barriers to use of DHTs for HCPs. However, attention must also be paid to reducing barriers to accessing DHTs for patients.

Item Type: Article
DOI/Identification number: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080055
Uncontrolled keywords: Health Equity, COVID-19, Biotechnology and Informatics, Qualitative Research, Primary Care, Health Services Accessibility
Subjects: H Social Sciences
Divisions: Divisions > Division for the Study of Law, Society and Social Justice > School of Social Policy, Sociology and Social Research > Centre for Health Services Studies
Funders: GW4 (https://ror.org/000vekr11)
SWORD Depositor: JISC Publications Router
Depositing User: JISC Publications Router
Date Deposited: 20 Mar 2024 09:54 UTC
Last Modified: 26 Mar 2024 13:14 UTC
Resource URI: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/105309 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)

University of Kent Author Information

  • Depositors only (login required):

Total unique views for this document in KAR since July 2020. For more details click on the image.