Damery, Sarah, Lambie, Mark, Williams, Lestyn, Coyle, David, Fotheringham, James, Solis-Trapala, Ivonne, Allen, Kerry, Potts, Jessica, Dikomitis, Lisa, Davies, Simon J. and others. (2024) Centre variation in home dialysis uptake: A survey of kidney centre practice in relation to home dialysis organisation and delivery in England. Peritoneal Dialysis International: Journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis, 44 (4). pp. 265-274. ISSN 0896-8608. (doi:10.1177/08968608241232200) (KAR id:105279)
PDF
Publisher pdf
Language: English
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
|
|
Download this file (PDF/243kB) |
Preview |
Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader | |
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/08968608241232200 |
Abstract
Background:
Disparities in home dialysis uptake across England suggest inequity and unexplained variation in access. We surveyed staff at all English kidney centres to identify patterns in service organisation/delivery and explore correlations with home therapy uptake, as part of a larger study (‘Inter-CEPt’), which aims to identify potentially modifiable factors to address observed variations.
Methods:
Between June and September 2022, staff working at English kidney centres were surveyed and individual responses combined into one centre-level response per question using predetermined data aggregation rules. Descriptive analysis described centre practices and their correlation with home dialysis uptake (proportion of new home dialysis starters) using 2019 UK Renal Registry 12-month home dialysis incidence data.
Results:
In total, 180 responses were received (50/51 centres, 98.0%). Despite varied organisation of home dialysis services, most components of service delivery and practice had minimal or weak correlations with home dialysis uptake apart from offering assisted peritoneal dialysis and ‘promoting flexible decision-making about dialysis modality’. Moderate to strong correlations were identified between home dialysis uptake and centres reporting supportive clinical leadership (correlation 0.32, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.05–0.55), an organisational culture that values trying new initiatives (0.57, 95% CI: 0.34–0.73); support for reflective practice (0.38, 95% CI: 0.11–0.60), facilitating research engagement (0.39, 95% CI: 0.13–0.61) and promoting continuous quality improvement (0.29, 95% CI: 0.01–0.53).
Conclusions:
Uptake of home dialysis is likely to be driven by organisational culture, leadership and staff attitudes, which provide a supportive clinical environment within which specific components of service organisation and delivery can be effective.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
DOI/Identification number: | 10.1177/08968608241232200 |
Projects: | UK National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Services & Delivery Research (HSDR) Programme (project reference 128364). |
Uncontrolled keywords: | home dialysis; home haemodialysis; kidney centre; kidney failure; peritoneal dialysis; survey; uptake |
Subjects: |
R Medicine R Medicine > RZ Other systems of medicine |
Divisions: | Divisions > Division of Natural Sciences > Kent and Medway Medical School |
Depositing User: | Manfred Gschwandtner |
Date Deposited: | 11 Mar 2024 11:09 UTC |
Last Modified: | 05 Nov 2024 13:11 UTC |
Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/105279 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Link to SensusAccess
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):