Guo, Shaohua, Zhang, Bufan, Feng, Yuanyuan, Wang, Yajie, Tse, Gary, Liu, Tong, Chen, Kang-Yin (2023) Impact of automatic acquisition of key clinical information on the accuracy of electrocardiogram interpretation: a cross-sectional study. BMC Medical Education, 23 (1). Article Number 936. ISSN 1472-6920. (doi:10.1186/s12909-023-04907-9) (KAR id:104247)
|
PDF
Publisher pdf
Language: English
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
|
|
|
Download this file (PDF/2MB) |
Preview |
| Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader | |
| Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04907-9 |
|
| Additional URLs: |
|
Abstract
Background: The accuracy of electrocardiogram (ECG) interpretation by doctors are affected by the available clinical information. However, having a complete set of clinical details before making a diagnosis is very difficult in the clinical setting especially in the early stages of the admission process. Therefore, we developed an artificial intelligence-assisted ECG diagnostic system (AI-ECG) using natural language processing to provide screened key clinical information during ECG interpretation.
Methods: Doctors with varying levels of training were asked to make diagnoses from 50 ECGs using a common ECG diagnosis system that does not contain clinical information. After a two-week-blanking period, the same set of ECGs was reinterpreted by the same doctors with AI-ECG containing clinical information. Two cardiologists independently provided diagnostic criteria for 50 ECGs, and discrepancies were resolved by consensus or, if necessary, by a third cardiologist. The accuracy of ECG interpretation was assessed, with each response scored as correct/partially correct = 1 or incorrect = 0.
Results: The mean accuracy of ECG interpretation was 30.2% and 36.2% with the common ECG system and AI-ECG system, respectively. Compared to the unaided ECG system, the accuracy of interpretation was significantly improved with the AI-ECG system (P for paired t-test = 0.002). For senior doctors, no improvement was found in ECG interpretation accuracy, while an AI-ECG system was associated with 27% higher mean scores (24.3 ± 9.4% vs. 30.9 ± 10.6%, P = 0.005) for junior doctors.
Conclusion: Intelligently screened key clinical information could improve the accuracy of ECG interpretation by doctors, especially for junior doctors.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| DOI/Identification number: | 10.1186/s12909-023-04907-9 |
| Uncontrolled keywords: | Artificial intelligence, Electrocardiogram interpretation, Key clinical information |
| Subjects: | R Medicine |
| Institutional Unit: | Schools > Kent and Medway Medical School |
| Former Institutional Unit: |
Divisions > Division of Natural Sciences > Kent and Medway Medical School
|
| SWORD Depositor: | JISC Publications Router |
| Depositing User: | JISC Publications Router |
| Date Deposited: | 16 Feb 2024 15:04 UTC |
| Last Modified: | 22 Jul 2025 09:18 UTC |
| Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/104247 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Link to SensusAccess
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5510-1253
Altmetric
Altmetric