Wong, Stephen, Burnley, Mark, Mauger, Alexis R., Sun, Fenghua, Hopker, James G. (2023) Functional threshold power and the (manufactured) critical power controversy. Journal of Sports Sciences, . pp. 1-2. ISSN 0264-0414. E-ISSN 1466-447X. (doi:10.1080/02640414.2023.2288757) (KAR id:104149)
PDF
Publisher pdf
Language: English
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
|
|
Download this file (PDF/433kB) |
Preview |
Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader | |
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2023.2288757 |
Abstract
We read with concern yet another communication from Dotan regarding the critical power (CP) concept which contains a litany of factual errors, false statements, and dated physiological interpretations. Space does not permit us to rebut every incorrect point made about our work (Wong et al., 2022) and the wider field in which it sits, but we will address what we consider to be some of the more egregious errors in his letter. We would first note, however, that our paper was not actually focused on the critical power concept.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
DOI/Identification number: | 10.1080/02640414.2023.2288757 |
Uncontrolled keywords: | VO2 kinetics; functional threshold power; maximal metabolic steady state; VO2 slow component; VO2 steady state |
Subjects: | Q Science > QP Physiology (Living systems) |
Divisions: | Divisions > Division of Natural Sciences > Sport and Exercise Sciences |
Funders: | University of Kent (https://ror.org/00xkeyj56) |
Depositing User: | Lex Mauger |
Date Deposited: | 01 Dec 2023 09:22 UTC |
Last Modified: | 05 Nov 2024 13:09 UTC |
Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/104149 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Link to SensusAccess
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):