Warwick-Giles, L., Hutchinson, J., Checkland, K., Hammond, J., Bramwell, D., Bailey, Simon, Sutton, M. (2023) Can Primary Care Networks contribute to the national goal of reducing health inequalities? A mixed method study. British Journal of General Practice, . ISSN 0960-1643. (doi:10.3399/BJGP.2023.0258) (KAR id:104025)
PDF
Author's Accepted Manuscript
Language: English |
|
Download this file (PDF/489kB) |
Preview |
Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader | |
XML Word Processing Document (DOCX)
Author's Accepted Manuscript
Language: English |
|
Download this file (XML Word Processing Document (DOCX)/59kB) |
|
Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader | |
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2023.0258 |
Abstract
Background: Significant health inequalities exist in England. Primary care networks (PCNs), comprised of GP practices, were introduced in England in 2019 with funding linked to membership. PCNs are tasked with tackling health inequalities. Aim: We consider how the design and introduction of PCNs might influence their ability to tackle health inequalities. Design and Setting: A sequential mixed methods study of Primary Care Networks in England. Methods: Linear regression of annual PCN allocated funding per workload-weighted patient on income deprivation score from 2019-2023. Qualitative interviews and observations of PCNs and PCN staff were undertaken across seven PCN sites in England (July 2020-March 2022). Results: Across 1,243 networks in 2019-20, a 10% higher level of income deprivation resulted in £0.31 (£0.25, £0.37), 4.50%, less funding per weighted patient. In 2022-23, the same difference in deprivation resulted in £0.16 (£0.11, £0.21), 0.60%, more funding. Qualitative interviews highlighted that although there were requirements for PCNs to tackle health inequalities, the policy design and PCN internal relationships and maturity shaped and sometimes restricted how PCNs approached this locally. Conclusion: Allocated PCN funding has become more pro-poor over time, suggesting that the need to account for deprivation within funding models is understood by policy makers. We highlight additional approaches which could support PCNs to tackle inequalities: better management support; encouragement and support to redistribute funding internally to support practices serving more deprived populations; and greater specificity in service requirements.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
DOI/Identification number: | 10.3399/BJGP.2023.0258 |
Subjects: | H Social Sciences |
Divisions: | Divisions > Division for the Study of Law, Society and Social Justice > School of Social Policy, Sociology and Social Research > Centre for Health Services Studies |
Funders: | University of Kent (https://ror.org/00xkeyj56) |
Depositing User: | Sian Robertson |
Date Deposited: | 22 Nov 2023 14:29 UTC |
Last Modified: | 08 Nov 2024 00:00 UTC |
Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/104025 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Link to SensusAccess
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):