Frost, Tom, Bachmann, Sascha-Dominik (2012) Human rights, colonialism and post-colonial conflict resolution: historical justice litigation. Amicus Curiae, 92 . pp. 20-22. ISSN 1461-2097. (doi:10.14296/ac.v2012i92.2106) (KAR id:102853)
XML Word Processing Document (DOCX)
Author's Accepted Manuscript
Language: English |
|
Download this file (XML Word Processing Document (DOCX)/29kB) |
|
Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader | |
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.14296/ac.v2012i92.2106 |
Abstract
The authors examine the potential of human rights litigation in the context of post-colonial conflict resolution, transitional justice and historical justice litigation. They describe the rationale and means of human rights protection found in the international legal system and outline the ways and means that have been applied to hold accountable those responsible for gross human rights abuses and violations. Measures have included seeking the criminal prosecution of the individual human rights perpetrator, as well as seeking civil damages against individual actors.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
DOI/Identification number: | 10.14296/ac.v2012i92.2106 |
Uncontrolled keywords: | Judicial review; historical justice litigation |
Subjects: | K Law |
Divisions: | Divisions > Division for the Study of Law, Society and Social Justice > Kent Law School |
Funders: |
Bournemouth University (https://ror.org/05wwcw481)
Newcastle University (https://ror.org/01kj2bm70) |
Depositing User: | Tom Frost |
Date Deposited: | 19 Sep 2023 15:42 UTC |
Last Modified: | 20 Sep 2023 15:09 UTC |
Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/102853 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Link to SensusAccess
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):