Serrano-Albal, María, Aquilina, Marie-Claire, Zak, Louisa J, Ellis, Peter J.I., Griffin, Darren K. (2023) Successful recovery of motile and viable boar sperm after vitrification with different methods (pearls and mini straws) using sucrose as a cryoprotectant. Cryobiology, 113 . Article Number 104583. ISSN 0011-2240. (doi:10.1016/j.cryobiol.2023.104583) (KAR id:102694)
PDF
Publisher pdf
Language: English
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
|
|
Download this file (PDF/1MB) |
Preview |
Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader | |
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cryobiol.2023.104583 |
Abstract
Vitrification of sperm by direct contact with liquid nitrogen is increasing in popularity as an alternative to conventional (slow) freezing. Although slow freezing is very challenging in boar sperm cryopreservation, this is currently the standard method used. We compared vitrification in “pearls” and in “mini straws” using the in vitro fertilization media Porcine Gamete Media with 0.3 M sucrose with the standard (slow) method used to preserve boar sperm. Both vitrification methods reduced the viability of the sperm sample more than slow freezing (42.2 ± 4.3% total motility and 71.4 ± 2.3% alive), however, both protocols allowed for the successful recovery of the sperm samples. By comparing two different methods of vitrification and two different methods of post-thaw preparation we were able to determine the optimal vitrification-thaw protocol for boar sperm. When comparing pearls and mini-straws, the smaller liquid volume associated with pearls had a positive effect on the survivability of the samples, reducing sperm DNA damage (1.2 ± 0.2% vs. 5.1 ± 0.1.7%) and preserving motility (26.15 ± 2.8% vs 9.39 ± 0.9%) after thawing. In conclusion, the pearl method was the most suitable of the vitrification techniques for use with boar sperm.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
DOI/Identification number: | 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2023.104583 |
Additional information: | For the purpose of open access, the author has applied a CC BY public copyright licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising from this submission. |
Uncontrolled keywords: | Sperm, Spermatozoa, Cryopreservation, Freezing, Slow freezing, Vitrification, Boar, Fertility |
Subjects: |
Q Science > QH Natural history > QH301 Biology Q Science > QP Physiology (Living systems) S Agriculture > SF Animal culture |
Divisions: | Divisions > Division of Natural Sciences > Biosciences |
Funders: | Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (https://ror.org/00cwqg982) |
Depositing User: | Peter Ellis |
Date Deposited: | 05 Sep 2023 15:20 UTC |
Last Modified: | 05 Nov 2024 13:08 UTC |
Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/102694 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Link to SensusAccess
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):