Stoeckel, Florian, Thompson, Jack, Szewach, Paula, Stöckli, Sabrina, Barnfield, Matthew, Phillips, Joseph B., Lyons, Benjamin, Mérola, Vittorio, Reifler, Jason (2023) Correlates of support for international vaccine solidarity during the COVID-19 pandemic: cross-sectional survey evidence from Germany. PLOS ONE, 18 (6). Article Number e0287257. E-ISSN 1932-6203. (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0287257) (KAR id:101819)
PDF
Publisher pdf
Language: English
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
|
|
Download this file (PDF/491kB) |
Preview |
Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader | |
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0287257 |
Abstract
During the COVID-19 pandemic, many residents of high-income countries (HICs) were eligible for COVID-19 vaccine boosters, while many residents of lower-income countries (LICs) had not yet received a first dose. HICs made some efforts to contribute to COVID-19 vaccination efforts in LICs, but these efforts were limited in scale. A new literature discusses the normative importance of an international redistribution of vaccines. Our analysis contributes an empirical perspective on the willingness of citizens in a HIC to contribute to such efforts (which we term international vaccine solidarity). We analyse the levels and predictors of international vaccine solidarity. We surveyed a representative sample of German adults (n = 2019) who participated in a two-wave YouGov online survey (w1: Sep 13–21, 2021 and w2: Oct 4–13, 2021). International vaccine solidarity is measured by asking respondents preferences for sharing vaccine supplies internationally versus using that supply as boosters for the domestic population. We examine a set of pre-registered hypotheses. Almost half of the respondents in our sample (48%) prioritize giving doses to citizens in less developed countries. A third of respondents (33%) prefer to use available doses as boosters domestically, and a fifth of respondents (19%) did not report a preference. In line with our hypotheses, respondents higher in cosmopolitanism and empathy, and those who support domestic redistribution exhibit more support for international dose-sharing. Older respondents (who might be more at risk) do not consistently show less support for vaccine solidarity. These results help us to get a better understanding of the way citizens’ form preferences about a mechanism that redistributes medical supplies internationally during a global crisis.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
DOI/Identification number: | 10.1371/journal.pone.0287257 |
Uncontrolled keywords: | Vaccines; booster doses; COVID 19; psychological attitudes; dose prediction methods; low income countries; vaccine development; pandemics |
Subjects: |
B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology R Medicine |
Divisions: | Divisions > Division of Human and Social Sciences > School of Psychology |
Funders: |
European Commission (https://ror.org/00k4n6c32)
European Research Council (https://ror.org/0472cxd90) |
SWORD Depositor: | JISC Publications Router |
Depositing User: | JISC Publications Router |
Date Deposited: | 26 Jun 2023 09:09 UTC |
Last Modified: | 05 Nov 2024 13:07 UTC |
Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/101819 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Link to SensusAccess
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):