Skip to main content
Kent Academic Repository

Field assessment of great crested newt Triturus cristatus mitigation projects in England.

Lewis, B. and Griffiths, Richard A. and Barrios, Y. (2007) Field assessment of great crested newt Triturus cristatus mitigation projects in England. Project report. Natural England (Access to this publication is currently restricted. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided) (KAR id:9904)

PDF (Field Assessment of Great Crested Newt)
Language: English

Restricted to Repository staff only
[thumbnail of Field Assessment of Great Crested Newt]


The status of great crested newts at 13 sites that have been subjected to mitigation before 2002 was assessed by standardized surveys carried out during March-May 2005. Ponds on the mitigation sites (n=31 in total) were each surveyed four times over this period by a combination of torch counts, bottle trapping and mark-recapture population estimates.

The quality of pre-development information on the sites was extremely variable. Moreover, because of (1) the paucity of standardized pre-development population assessment data; and (2) changes in the aquatic and terrestrial habitats at the sites, comparisons of the current population assessments with historical data were difficult.

A combination of the English Nature (2001) and Griffiths and others. (1996) scoring systems suggested that four of the sites contained ‘small’ populations; four sites contained ‘small-medium’ populations; four sites contained ‘medium’ populations; and one site contained a ‘medium-large’ population. In terms of presence or absence of newts, those ponds and associated terrestrial habitats that had relatively high Habitat Suitability Indices (HSIs) generally contained great crested newts. However, as some sites with high HSIs had low counts of newts by torching or trapping, the relationship between HSIs and newt counts was weak. Although many of the sites contained appropriate aquatic and terrestrial habitats for newts, the majority were very isolated by development and had poor connectivity to other suitable habitats. Nevertheless, two ponds at different sites supported ‘medium to large’ numbers of newts despite high levels of fragmentation, development and connectivity to just one and two other ponds respectively. The level of ongoing survey and management at the sites varied, with some sites suffering from a lack of both activities.

The data show that great crested newt populations can be maintained at sites subject to development mitigation. However, further surveys are needed to assess the long-term viability of these populations. Equally, more attention needs to be placed on ensuring habitat connectivity and long-term management plans for such sites.

Item Type: Reports and Papers (Project report)
Additional information: Natural England Research Report NERR001
Subjects: G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > GE Environmental Sciences
G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > GN Anthropology
Divisions: Divisions > Division of Human and Social Sciences > School of Anthropology and Conservation > DICE (Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology)
Depositing User: C.G.W.G. van-de-Benderskum
Date Deposited: 02 Jul 2008 12:21 UTC
Last Modified: 16 Nov 2021 09:48 UTC
Resource URI: (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)

University of Kent Author Information

Griffiths, Richard A..

Creator's ORCID:
CReDIT Contributor Roles:
  • Depositors only (login required):

Total unique views for this document in KAR since July 2020. For more details click on the image.