Petterson, Aino, Currie, Greg, Friend, Stacie, Ferguson, Heather J. (2022) The Effect of Narratives on Attitudes Toward Animal Welfare and Pro-Social Behaviour on Behalf of Animals: Three Pre-Registered Experiments. Poetics, 94 . Article Number 101709. ISSN 0304-422X. (doi:10.1016/j.poetic.2022.101709) (KAR id:96937)
PDF
Publisher pdf
Language: English
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
|
|
Download this file (PDF/2MB) |
Preview |
Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader | |
PDF
Author's Accepted Manuscript
Language: English Restricted to Repository staff only
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
|
|
Contact us about this Publication
|
|
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2022.101709 |
Abstract
We report three randomised and pre-registered experiments examining the effects of narrative fiction (vs. narrative non-fiction vs. expository non-fiction) on concern for animal welfare. In Experiment 1a (N = 363) there was no significant increase in concern for animal welfare or willingness to donate to an animal charity among participants who read a narrative fiction text about a monkey’s plight (vs. narrative non-fiction or expository non-fiction texts about a monkey). In Experiment 1b (N = 121) concern for animal welfare and willingness to donate was greater after reading the narrative fiction text compared to a narrative non-fiction text unrelated to animals. Experiment 2 (N = 184) employed a simplified design and more severe depiction of animal abuse, but showed no beneficial effect of reading a narrative fiction text about a monkey’s plight (vs. a narrative non-fiction text unrelated to animals) on either measure. Experiment 3 (N = 290) compared a narrative fiction and a non-fiction text about a monkey or a lizard; participants who read a narrative fiction text, irrespective of the animal depicted, reported greater concern for animal welfare, monkey welfare, lizard welfare and nature (vs. a narrative non-fiction text). However, participants were no more willing to donate in the narrative fiction (vs. non-fiction) condition. These results suggest that reading a narrative fiction text about an animal’s plight has a limited effect on concern for animal welfare.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
DOI/Identification number: | 10.1016/j.poetic.2022.101709 |
Uncontrolled keywords: | narratives, reading, literary fiction, animal welfare, prosocial behaviour |
Subjects: | B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology |
Divisions: | Divisions > Division of Human and Social Sciences > School of Psychology |
Funders: | Leverhulme Trust (https://ror.org/012mzw131) |
Depositing User: | Heather Ferguson |
Date Deposited: | 15 Sep 2022 07:15 UTC |
Last Modified: | 04 Mar 2024 15:23 UTC |
Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/96937 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Link to SensusAccess
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):