Skip to main content
Kent Academic Repository

Making an impression: The effects of sharing conspiracy theories

Green, Ricky, Toribio-Flórez, Daniel, Douglas, Karen, Brunkow, James, Sutton, Robbie M. (2023) Making an impression: The effects of sharing conspiracy theories. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 104 . Article Number 104398. ISSN 0022-1031. (doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2022.104398) (KAR id:96268)

PDF Publisher pdf
Language: English


Download this file
(PDF/938kB)
[thumbnail of 1-s2.0-S0022103122001172-main.pdf]
Preview
Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader
PDF Author's Accepted Manuscript
Language: English

Restricted to Repository staff only
Contact us about this Publication
[thumbnail of Green et al JESP.pdf]
Official URL:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2022.104398

Abstract

Conspiracy theories are widely viewed as stigmatized beliefs, and it is often assumed that sharing them will therefore have negative reputational consequences for individuals. In six experiments (two pre-registered), we examined how sharing conspiracy theories can have important consequences for both impression-management and impression-formation. Experiment 1 (N = 354) highlighted people’s awareness of an impression-management strategy in sharing conspiracy theories. Participants perceived that others would share conspiracy theories when aiming to create unfavorable impressions, and would avoid sharing them to create favorable impressions. Experiments 2 and 3 (Ns = 137 and 150) examined participants’ own impression-management motives for sharing conspiracy theories and demonstrated that these motives depended on their own conspiracy beliefs. Specifically, participants with weaker conspiracy beliefs perceived that they would share conspiracy theories mainly to portray themselves negatively, and as radical, unstable, and unique people, whereas those with stronger conspiracy beliefs perceived that they would share conspiracy theories mainly to appear stable and honest. Experiments 4a, 4b and 5 (Ns = 248, 250 and 417) focused on impression-formation. Participants evaluated fictitious politicians who shared (vs. refuted) conspiracy theories as less predictable and competent, but also as a “rogue” political outsider who is likely to effect change. Moderation analyses indicated that these differences were less pronounced or even reversed among participants with right-wing attitudes (Experiments 4a, Experiment 5) and those with strong conspiracy beliefs (Experiment 5). We discuss the importance of examining conspiracy theories from this communicative perspective.

Item Type: Article
DOI/Identification number: 10.1016/j.jesp.2022.104398
Uncontrolled keywords: conspiracy theories, conspiracy beliefs, impression-formation, impression-management, politics, communication
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Divisions: Divisions > Division of Human and Social Sciences > School of Psychology
Funders: European Research Council (https://ror.org/0472cxd90)
Depositing User: Karen Douglas
Date Deposited: 17 Aug 2022 19:32 UTC
Last Modified: 01 Mar 2023 16:59 UTC
Resource URI: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/96268 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)

University of Kent Author Information

Green, Ricky.

Creator's ORCID:
CReDIT Contributor Roles:

Toribio-Flórez, Daniel.

Creator's ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9706-709X
CReDIT Contributor Roles:

Douglas, Karen.

Creator's ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0381-6924
CReDIT Contributor Roles:

Sutton, Robbie M..

Creator's ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1542-1716
CReDIT Contributor Roles:
  • Depositors only (login required):

Total unique views for this document in KAR since July 2020. For more details click on the image.