Skip to main content

The Global Reporting Initiative’s (GRI) Past, Present and Future: Critical reflections and a research agenda on sustainability reporting (standard-setting)

de Villiers, Charl, La Torre, M., Molinari, M. (2022) The Global Reporting Initiative’s (GRI) Past, Present and Future: Critical reflections and a research agenda on sustainability reporting (standard-setting). Pacific Accounting Review, . ISSN 0114-0582. (doi:10.1108/PAR-02-2022-0034) (KAR id:94859)

PDF Author's Accepted Manuscript
Language: English
Download (480kB) Preview
[thumbnail of DeVilliersetal.2022PARCriticalReflectionontheGRIandFutureResearchAgenda-acceptedversion.pdf]
Preview
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
Official URL:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/PAR-02-2022-0034

Abstract

Purpose – The paper reflects on the future of sustainability reporting standards by examining the current practical initiatives and the Global Reporting Initiative’s (GRI) position in the arena of non-financial and sustainability reporting, and identifies avenues for future research. Design/methodology/approach – A critical reflection and analysis of research on the GRI’s achievements and the influence of the IFRS Foundation’s initiative to develop global sustainability reporting standards. Findings – The GRI has a dominant position in sustainability reporting standard-setting related to the provision of information about the influence of reporting organisations on society and the natural environment. The IFRS Foundation’s initiative to enter the sustainability reporting standard-setting arena, although from the perspective of providing information to investors regarding the influence of society and the environment on the reporting organisation, is an attempt to solidify its own position as the reporting standard setter of choice, not only for financial reporting, but for all reporting standards. However, despite its aim to differentiate its role from the GRI by leveraging the financial-oriented ideological side of double materiality, we argue that the IFRS is unlikely to harm the GRI's global position in producing multi-stakeholder standards for sustainability reporting and accountability. This differentiated position is facilitated by the different sources of legitimacy the GRI and IFRS rely on. Originality – Due to the recent initiatives for creating new sustainability reporting standard-setters, this paper offers one of the first critical reflections on the past and the likely future of the GRI and its sustainability reporting standards. The paper also identifies several new avenues for future research.

Item Type: Article
DOI/Identification number: 10.1108/PAR-02-2022-0034
Uncontrolled keywords: GRI; Sustainability Reporting Standards; ISSB; Standard-setting
Subjects: H Social Sciences
Divisions: Divisions > Kent Business School - Division > Department of Accounting and Finance
Depositing User: Matteo Molinari
Date Deposited: 03 May 2022 12:12 UTC
Last Modified: 27 May 2022 15:10 UTC
Resource URI: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/94859 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)
Molinari, M.: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3851-4974
  • Depositors only (login required):

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year