Davoodi, Telli, Jamshidi-Sianaki, Maryam, Payir, Ayse, Cui, Yixin Kelly, Clegg, Jennifer, McLoughlin, Niamh, Harris, Paul L., Corriveau, Kathleen H. (2022) Miraculous, magical, or mundane? The development of beliefs about stories with divine, magical, or realistic causation. Memory & Cognition, . ISSN 0090-502X. E-ISSN 1532-5946. (doi:10.3758/s13421-021-01270-2) (KAR id:92652)
PDF
Author's Accepted Manuscript
Language: English |
|
Download this file (PDF/463kB) |
Preview |
Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader | |
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-021-01270-2 |
Abstract
Children’s naïve theories about causal regularities enable them to differentiate factual narratives describing real events and characters from fictional narratives describing made-up events and characters (Corriveau, Kim, Schwalen, & Harris, 2009). But what happens when children are consistently presented with accounts of miraculous and causally impossible events as real occurrences? Previous research has shown that preschoolers with consistent exposure to religious teaching tend to systematically judge characters involved in fantastical or religious events as real (Corriveau et al., 2015; Davoodi et al., 2016). In the current study, we extended this line of work by asking whether the scope of this influence is a domain-general effect or a domain-specific effect. We tested children in Iran, where regular exposure to uniform religious beliefs might influence children’s reasoning about possibility in non-religious domains, in addition to the domain of religion. Children with no or minimal schooling (5-6-year-olds) and older elementary school students (9-10-year-olds) judged the reality status of different kinds of stories, notably realistic, unusual (but nonetheless realistic), religious, and magical stories. We found that while younger children were not systematic in their judgments, older children often judged religious stories as real but rarely judged magical stories as real. This developmental pattern suggests that the impact of religious exposure on children’s reality judgments does not extend beyond their reasoning about divine intervention. Children’s justifications for their reality judgments provided further support for this domain-specific influence of religious teaching.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
DOI/Identification number: | 10.3758/s13421-021-01270-2 |
Uncontrolled keywords: | Testimony, possibility, religion, community consensus, reality |
Subjects: | H Social Sciences |
Divisions: | Divisions > Division of Human and Social Sciences > School of Psychology |
Depositing User: | Niamh MCLOUGHLIN |
Date Deposited: | 11 Jan 2022 11:43 UTC |
Last Modified: | 05 Nov 2024 12:57 UTC |
Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/92652 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Link to SensusAccess
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):