Ellen, Roy F. (2003) Arbitrariness and necessity in ethnobiological classification: notes on some persisting issues. In: Sanga, Glauco and Ortalli, Gherardo, eds. Nature knowledge: ethnoscience, cognition and utility. Berghahn Books, Oxford, pp. 47-56. ISBN 978-1-57181-823-2. (The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided) (KAR id:9098)
| The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided. | |
| Official URL: http://bookshop.blackwell.co.uk/jsp/id/Nature_Know... |
Abstract
Numerous scholars, in particular anthropologists, historians, economists, linguists, and biologists, have, over the last few years, studied forms of knowledge and use of nature, and the ways in which nature can be protected and conserved. Some of the most prominent scholars have come together in this volume to reflect on what has been achieved so far, to compare the work carried out in the past, to discuss the problems that have emerged from different research projects, and to map out the way forward.
| Item Type: | Book section |
|---|---|
| Subjects: | G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > GN Anthropology |
| Divisions: | Divisions > Division of Human and Social Sciences > School of Anthropology and Conservation |
| Depositing User: | C.G.W.G. van-de-Benderskum |
| Date Deposited: | 11 Sep 2008 14:35 UTC |
| Last Modified: | 16 Nov 2021 09:47 UTC |
| Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/9098 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):
Download Statistics
Download Statistics
