Skip to main content
Kent Academic Repository

Mitigating the Impacts of Development Corridors on Biodiversity: A Global Review

Juffe Bignoli, Diego, Burgess, Neil D., Hobbs, Jonathan, Smith, Robert J., Tam, Christine, Thorn, Jessica P.R., Bull, Joseph W. (2021) Mitigating the Impacts of Development Corridors on Biodiversity: A Global Review. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 9 . Article Number 683949. E-ISSN 2296-701X. (doi:10.3389/fevo.2021.683949) (KAR id:90372)


Development corridors are extensive, often transnational and linear, geographical areas targeted for investment to help achieve sustainable development. They often comprise the creation of hard infrastructure (i.e., physical structures) and soft infrastructure (i.e., policies, plans, and programmes) involving a variety of actors. They are globally widespread, and likely to be a significant driver of habitat loss. Here, we describe the development corridors phenomenon from a biodiversity perspective and identify the elements of best practice in biodiversity impact mitigation. We use these to carry out a review of the peer reviewed literature on corridors to respond to three questions: (i) how impacts on biodiversity and ecosystem services are assessed; (ii) what mitigation measures are discussed to manage these impacts; and (iii) to what extent do these measures approximate to best practice. We found that of 271 publications on development corridors across all continents (except for Antarctica) mentioning biodiversity or ecosystem services, only 100 (37%) assessed impacts on biodiversity and 7 (3%) on ecosystem services. Importantly, only half of these (52, 19% of the total 271 articles) discussed mitigation measures to manage these impacts. These measures focused on avoidance and minimisation and there was scant mention of restoration or ecological compensation illustrating a deficient application of the mitigation hierarchy. We conclude that the academic literature on corridors does not give sufficient consideration to comprehensive mitigation of biodiversity impacts. To change this, impact assessment research needs to acknowledge the complexity of such multi-project and multi-stakeholder initiatives, quantify biodiversity losses due to the full suite of their potential direct, indirect and cumulative impacts, and follow all the steps of the mitigation hierarchy impact framework. We suggest a series of research avenues and policy recommendations to improve impact assessments of corridors towards achieving better biodiversity outcomes.

Item Type: Article
DOI/Identification number: 10.3389/fevo.2021.683949
Uncontrolled keywords: development corridors, infrastructure corridors, mitigation hierarchy, economic corridors, biodiversity mitigation, impact assesment, strategic environmental assessment, environmental impact assessement
Subjects: Q Science > QH Natural history > QH75 Conservation (Biology)
Divisions: Divisions > Division of Human and Social Sciences > School of Anthropology and Conservation > DICE (Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology)
Depositing User: Diego Juffe-Bignoli
Date Deposited: 27 Sep 2021 11:05 UTC
Last Modified: 15 Feb 2022 23:11 UTC
Resource URI: (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)

University of Kent Author Information

Juffe Bignoli, Diego.

Creator's ORCID:
CReDIT Contributor Roles:

Smith, Robert J..

Creator's ORCID:
CReDIT Contributor Roles:

Bull, Joseph W..

Creator's ORCID:
CReDIT Contributor Roles:
  • Depositors only (login required):

Total unique views for this document in KAR since July 2020. For more details click on the image.