Skip to main content

Is (in)access to infrastructure driven by physical delivery or weak governance? Power and knowledge asymmetries in Cape Town, South Africa

Haque, Anika Nasra, Lemanski, Charlotte, Groot, Jiska de (2021) Is (in)access to infrastructure driven by physical delivery or weak governance? Power and knowledge asymmetries in Cape Town, South Africa. Geoforum, 126 . pp. 48-58. ISSN 0016-7185. (doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2021.07.013) (Access to this publication is currently restricted. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided) (KAR id:89544)

PDF Publisher pdf
Language: English

Restricted to Repository staff only

Contact us about this Publication
[thumbnail of Haque et al. 2021b.pdf]
Official URL
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2021.07.013

Abstract

Despite widespread scholarly recognition that infrastructure delivery and consumption is as much a sociopolitical process as a technical-material product, global development agendas (e.g. United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals) continue to prioritise the universal provision of public infrastructure as a static transfer of physical goods/services without explicit recognition of their socio-political dimensions. This paper explores the everyday ways in which citizens negotiate public infrastructure delivery and access, situated in a global South context of extreme inequality and limited state capacity. Using a case study of two low-income settlements in Cape Town with differing infrastructure provision, we demonstrate how governance processes can undermine the physical delivery of infrastructure. While participatory governance remains a core policy mechanism to democratise service delivery, in practice the capacity of citizens to participate is affected by power and

knowledge asymmetries that function both within and between communities and the state. These asymmetric power relations and knowledge flows contribute to clientelistic politics that not only limit citizen engagement in participatory governance, but actively undermine low-income urban dwellers’ access to services that have been physically delivered and targeted to meet their needs. Framed by a case study of energy interventions, we conclude that widening access to public infrastructure requires significant investment in effective governance processes for low-income urban dwellers.

Item Type: Article
DOI/Identification number: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2021.07.013
Projects: [UNSPECIFIED] Learning between stakeholders: energy innovation for low-income housing in the Western Cape, South Africa
Uncontrolled keywords: Urban infrastructure, Power asymmetry, Knowledge asymmetry, Participation, Governance, Service delivery, Energy governance
Subjects: G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > G Geography (General)
Divisions: Divisions > Division of Human and Social Sciences > School of Anthropology and Conservation
Depositing User: Anika Haque
Date Deposited: 31 Jul 2021 13:01 UTC
Last Modified: 04 Aug 2021 15:45 UTC
Resource URI: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/89544 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)
Haque, Anika Nasra: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0717-376X
  • Depositors only (login required):