Skip to main content

Social identity theory and group diversity : an analysis of functions of group identification

Aharpour, Sabina (1999) Social identity theory and group diversity : an analysis of functions of group identification. Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) thesis, University of Kent. (doi:10.22024/UniKent/01.02.86104) (KAR id:86104)

PDF (DX214233.pdf)
Language: English


Download (14MB) Preview
[thumbnail of DX214233.pdf]
Preview
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
Official URL
https://doi.org/10.22024/UniKent/01.02.86104

Abstract

This thesis examines differences between social groups and the relationship between ingroupidentification and ingroup bias within the framework of Social Identity Theory. The main goalof our investigation is that of understanding the reason of the variation encountered in studiestesting the identification-bias association. While one of the solutions proposed by previousresearch (Hinkle and Brown, 1990) focuses on group differences on the dimensions ofcollectivism and relational orientation, our suggestion is that of considering group differences inthe functions that drive their group identification. Two functions of group identificationemerged — between the others — as meaningful in differentiating between the four groups wetested (Psychology students, football supporters, and trade unionists): A materialistic and self-interested motivation,

Item Type: Thesis (Doctor of Philosophy (PhD))
DOI/Identification number: 10.22024/UniKent/01.02.86104
Additional information: This thesis has been digitised by EThOS, the British Library digitisation service, for purposes of preservation and dissemination. It was uploaded to KAR on 09 February 2021 in order to hold its content and record within University of Kent systems. It is available Open Access using a Creative Commons Attribution, Non-commercial, No Derivatives (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) licence so that the thesis and its author, can benefit from opportunities for increased readership and citation. This was done in line with University of Kent policies (https://www.kent.ac.uk/is/strategy/docs/Kent%20Open%20Access%20policy.pdf). If you feel that your rights are compromised by open access to this thesis, or if you would like more information about its availability, please contact us at ResearchSupport@kent.ac.uk and we will seriously consider your claim under the terms of our Take-Down Policy (https://www.kent.ac.uk/is/regulations/library/kar-take-down-policy.html).
Uncontrolled keywords: Psychology
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Divisions: Divisions > Division of Human and Social Sciences > School of Psychology
SWORD Depositor: SWORD Copy
Depositing User: SWORD Copy
Date Deposited: 29 Oct 2019 16:28 UTC
Last Modified: 14 Feb 2022 12:11 UTC
Resource URI: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/86104 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)
  • Depositors only (login required):

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year