Skip to main content

The Consideration of Indigenous Peoples in High Stakes Evaluations of Risk

Almond, Madison F. E., Cook, Alana N., Storey, Jennifer E. (2020) The Consideration of Indigenous Peoples in High Stakes Evaluations of Risk. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, . ISSN 1499-9013. E-ISSN 1932-9903. (doi:10.1080/14999013.2020.1842563) (KAR id:84001)

PDF Publisher pdf
Language: English

Restricted to Repository staff only
Contact us about this Publication
[thumbnail of Almond et al. 2020-TheConsiderationofIndigenousPeoplesinHighStakesEvaluationsofRisk.pdf]
XML Word Processing Document (DOCX) Author's Accepted Manuscript
Language: English
Download (110kB)
[thumbnail of DO-LTO Indigenous Manuscript FINAL.docx]
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
Official URL
https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2020.1842563

Abstract

While Indigenous peoples account for a small portion of the Canadian population, they are overrepresented in the Canadian Criminal Justice System. Research and case law suggest culture should always be considered in violence risk assessments (VRAs), but it is unknown whether this recommendation is followed. The present study examined the role of Indigenous versus non-Indigenous culture in judicial opinions regarding evaluators’ VRA and expert witness testimony in Dangerous Offender and Long-Term Offender (DO/LTO) hearings under Canadian Law. 214 DO/LTO hearings from 2009-2016 where judges commented on VRAs submitted to the court were systematically identified via the Canadian Legal Information Institute database. Judicial comments were analyzed in cases with Indigenous and non-Indigenous defendants for discussions of culture and the prevalence of comments regarding qualities of the evaluator(s), qualities of the VRA(s) completed, and qualities ofthe evaluators’ expert testimony about the VRA. Judges considered culture meaningfully in 64% of Indigenous offenders’ cases. Discussion of VRA tools’ content was significantly more frequent in non-Indigenous cases; otherwise, frequency of non-cultural themes did not vary between case groups. Given the importance of considering culture in VRA, it is concerning that culture was considered in just over half of cases; improving this deficit is discussed.

Item Type: Article
DOI/Identification number: 10.1080/14999013.2020.1842563
Uncontrolled keywords: indigenous culture; aboriginal; violence risk assessment; expert evidence; sentencing
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Divisions: Divisions > Division of Human and Social Sciences > School of Psychology
Depositing User: Jennifer Storey
Date Deposited: 09 Nov 2020 17:17 UTC
Last Modified: 06 Nov 2021 00:00 UTC
Resource URI: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/84001 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)
Storey, Jennifer E.: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6432-2514
  • Depositors only (login required):

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year