Skip to main content

Incentive value and spatial certainty combine additively to determine visual priorities

Garner, Kelly, Bowman, Howard, Raymond, Jane (2020) Incentive value and spatial certainty combine additively to determine visual priorities. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, . ISSN 1943-3921. (doi:10.3758/s13414-020-02124-w) (KAR id:83566)

PDF Publisher pdf
Language: English


Download (1MB) Preview
[thumbnail of Garner_Incentive_Value_And_Spatial_Certainty_2020.pdf]
Preview
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
Official URL
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-020-02124-w

Abstract

How does the brain combine information predictive of the value of a visually guided task (incentive value) with information predictive of where task-relevant stimuli may occur (spatial certainty)? Human behavioural evidence indicates that these two predictions may be combined additively to bias visual selection (Additive Hypothesis), whereas neuroeconomic studies posit that they may be multiplicatively combined (Expected Value Hypothesis). We sought to adjudicate between these two alternatives. Participants viewed two coloured placeholders that specified the potential value of correctly identifying an imminent letter target if it appeared in that placeholder. Then, prior to the target’s presentation, an endogenous spatial cue was presented indicating the target’s more likely location. Spatial cues were parametricallymanipulated with regard to the information gained (in bits). Across two experiments, performance was better for targets appearing in high versus low value placeholders and better when targets appeared in validly cued locations. Interestingly, as shown with a Bayesian model selection approach, these effects did not interact, clearly supporting the Additive Hypothesis. Even when conditions were adjusted to increase the optimality of a multiplicative operation, support for it remained. These findings refute recent theories that expected value computations are the singular mechanism driving the deployment of endogenous spatial attention. Instead, incentive value and spatial certainty seem to act independently to influence visual selection.

Item Type: Article
DOI/Identification number: 10.3758/s13414-020-02124-w
Uncontrolled keywords: Attention, Prediction, Expectation, Reward, Incentive
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
R Medicine > RC Internal medicine > RC321 Neuroscience. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry
Divisions: Divisions > Division of Computing, Engineering and Mathematical Sciences > School of Computing
Depositing User: Howard Bowman
Date Deposited: 19 Oct 2020 22:04 UTC
Last Modified: 16 Feb 2021 14:15 UTC
Resource URI: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/83566 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)
Bowman, Howard: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4736-1869
  • Depositors only (login required):

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year