Skip to main content

Refuse Disposal

Goldstein, Laurence (2002) Refuse Disposal. Analysis, 62 (3). pp. 236-241. ISSN 0003-2638. (doi:10.1111/1467-8284.00362) (KAR id:8296)

Microsoft Word
Language: English
Click to download this file (40kB)
[thumbnail of rd.doc]
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
Official URL:


When Kripke asks: `Does Pierre or does he not believe that London is beautiful?’, we should refuse to answer simply `Yes’ or `No’, for, knowing the Pierre story, we know that anything other than a qualified reply will be distorting. If asked whether it is true or false that the Barber of Alcala (who shaves all and only those villagers who do not shave themselves) shaves himself, we should, again, refuse to answer, since, provably, no such barber exists. It turns out that a principled refusal to ascribe a truth-value (which is not the same as ascribing a different truth-value) is the key to disposing of many paradoxes, including the Liar and its variants.

Item Type: Article
DOI/Identification number: 10.1111/1467-8284.00362
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BC Logic
Divisions: Divisions > Division of Arts and Humanities > School of Culture and Languages
Depositing User: Laurence Goldstein
Date Deposited: 02 Oct 2008 09:42 UTC
Last Modified: 16 Nov 2021 09:46 UTC
Resource URI: (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)
  • Depositors only (login required):

Total unique views for this document in KAR since July 2020. For more details click on the image.