Skip to main content
Kent Academic Repository

Head-to-Head Comparison of the Psychometric Properties of 3 Carer-Related Preference-Based Instruments

McCaffrey, Nikki, Bucholc, Jessica, Rand, Stacey, Hoefman, Renske, Ugalde, Anna, Muldowney, Anne, Mihalopoulos, Catherine, Engel, Lidia (2020) Head-to-Head Comparison of the Psychometric Properties of 3 Carer-Related Preference-Based Instruments. Value in Health, 23 (11). pp. 1477-1488. ISSN 1098-3015. (doi:10.1016/j.jval.2020.07.005) (KAR id:82160)


Objectives: To compare the psychometric properties of the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit for carers (ASCOT-Carer), the Carer Experience Scale (CES), and the Care-related Quality of Life (CarerQol) to inform the choice of instrument in future studies. Methods: Data were derived from a 2018 online survey of informal carers in Australia. Reliability was assessed via internal consistency (Cronbach alpha, α) and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC) for respondents who self-reported no change in their quality of life as a carer over 2 weeks. Convergent validity was evaluated via predetermined hypotheses about associations (Spearman’s rank correlation) with existing, validated measures. Discriminative validity was assessed based on the ability of the carer-related scores to distinguish between different informal care situations (Mann–Whitney U, Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis of variance). Results: Data from 500 carers were analyzed. The ASCOT-Carer demonstrated a higher degree of internal consistency, possibly due to a unidimensional structure, and test-retest reliability than the CarerQol and CES (α = 0.87, 0.65, 0.59; ICC, 0.87, 0.67, 0.81, respectively). All 3 instruments exhibited convergent validity and detected statistically significant associations between carer-related scores and different informal care situations, except for the CarerQol-7D and sole carer status. Conclusions: The ASCOT-Carer, CarerQol, and CES performed reasonably well psychometrically; the ASCOT-Carer exhibited the best psychometric properties overall in this sample of Australian informal carers. Findings should be used in conjunction with consideration of research goals, carer population, targeted carer-related constructs, and prevailing perspectives on the economic evaluation to inform choice of instrument in future studies.

Item Type: Article
DOI/Identification number: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.07.005
Uncontrolled keywords: carer-related quality of life, economic evaluation, informal care, outcome measurement, preference-based measures
Subjects: H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General)
Divisions: Divisions > Division for the Study of Law, Society and Social Justice > School of Social Policy, Sociology and Social Research > Personal Social Services Research Unit
Depositing User: Stacey Rand
Date Deposited: 20 Jul 2020 10:00 UTC
Last Modified: 04 Mar 2024 17:55 UTC
Resource URI: (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)

University of Kent Author Information

  • Depositors only (login required):

Total unique views for this document in KAR since July 2020. For more details click on the image.