Skip to main content

Teaching and learning guide for: The role of individual differences in understanding and enhancing intergroup contact

Hodson, Gordon, Turner, Rhiannon N., Dhont, Kristof (2020) Teaching and learning guide for: The role of individual differences in understanding and enhancing intergroup contact. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, . ISSN 1751-9004. (doi:10.1111/spc3.12551) (Access to this publication is currently restricted. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided) (KAR id:81974)

PDF Author's Accepted Manuscript
Language: English

Restricted to Repository staff only until 23 June 2021.
Contact us about this Publication
[img]
Official URL
https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12551

Abstract

Intergroup contact, the direct or extended (or virtual/imagined) interaction with members of other groups, has enjoyed a long history in social psychology. Allport (1954) introduced the “Contact Hypothesis”, which has since evolved into a full and complex “Contact Theory” (Brown & Hewstone, 2005; see also Hodson & Hewstone, 2013; Pettigrew & Tropp, 2001; Turner, Hewstone, Voci, Vonofakou, & Christ, 2007). Across different types of groups, different types of contact, and different methodologies, researchers find that having more encounters with specific outgroup

members tends to reduce prejudice toward that group as a whole (see meta-analyses by Davies, Tropp, Aron, Pettigrew, & Wright, 2014; Pettigrew & Tropp, 2006; Lemmer & Wagner, 2015). Importantly, contact works more reliably at reducing prejudice relative to other interventions (e.g., Beelmann & Heinemann, 2014). Yet researchers historically felt that individual differences in prejudice-proneness (e.g., authoritarianism) were either irrelevant to, or were obstacles to, contact-based prejudice reduction (see Hodson, Costello, & MacInnis, 2013). More recently, interest in individual differences in contact settings has grown steadily. This article serves as an education tool to not only teach students about intergroup contact and personality (among other individual differences), but to encourage them to consider the possibilities for learning and prejudice reduction when these two topics are conceptually integrated.

Item Type: Article
DOI/Identification number: 10.1111/spc3.12551
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
H Social Sciences
Divisions: Faculties > Social Sciences > School of Psychology
Depositing User: Kristof Dhont
Date Deposited: 03 Jul 2020 10:10 UTC
Last Modified: 03 Jul 2020 10:11 UTC
Resource URI: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/81974 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)
Dhont, Kristof: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6060-8083
  • Depositors only (login required):

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year