Skip to main content

Forensic Expertise in Facial Image Comparison

Claydon, Jacqueline (2019) Forensic Expertise in Facial Image Comparison. Master of Science by Research (MScRes) thesis, University of Kent,. (Access to this publication is currently restricted. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided) (KAR id:81910)

PDF
Language: English

Restricted to Repository staff only until September 2022.
Contact us about this Publication
[img]

Abstract

Deciding whether two images of unfamiliar faces are the same person or two different people is a difficult task, but one in which forensic facial examiners generally outperform untrained observers, although not with perfect accuracy. Here, the ways in which they perform face matching were compared with forensically-trained and non-expert controls whilst eye movements were recorded. In Experiments 1 and 2, examiners were the most accurate group. In Experiment 3, rating the features prior to the same or different matching decision improved the controls' performance which reduced the examiners' accuracy advantage. Across the experiments, all groups showed similar patterns of responses to the face pairs and similar attention to the features, including a bias towards faces on the left of the screen. The higher overall accuracy of examiners was not accounted for by differences in viewing times, or by a more conservative response to feature rating. Further, examining the performance of individual examiners showed how group accuracy was driven by some high performers, although the same examiners were not consistently the most accurate in all experiments. Overall, this study did not find any differences in the way professionals viewed faces which might explain their high performance as a group. However, as the adoption of a feature comparison strategy improved accuracy for both control groups, this suggests high accuracy for facial experts may be due to their methodological approach to face matching rather than any qualitative differences in their viewing behaviours.

Item Type: Thesis (Master of Science by Research (MScRes))
Thesis advisor: Bindemann, Markus
Uncontrolled keywords: Unfamiliar face matching, face perception, individual differences, facial image comparison, forensic science
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Divisions: Faculties > Social Sciences > School of Psychology
SWORD Depositor: System Moodle
Depositing User: System Moodle
Date Deposited: 29 Jun 2020 10:10 UTC
Last Modified: 30 Jun 2020 08:07 UTC
Resource URI: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/81910 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)
  • Depositors only (login required):

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year