Rutherford, Brian A. (2020) Are Accounting Standards Memes? The Survival Of Accounting Evolution In An Age Of Regulation. Philosophy of Management, . ISSN 1740-3812. (doi:10.1007/s40926-020-00142-0) (KAR id:81874)
PDF
Publisher pdf
Language: English
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
|
|
Download this file (PDF/486kB) |
Preview |
Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader | |
PDF
Author's Accepted Manuscript
Language: English Restricted to Repository staff only |
|
Contact us about this Publication
|
![]() |
Microsoft Word
Author's Accepted Manuscript
Language: English Restricted to Repository staff only |
|
Contact us about this Publication
|
![]() |
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40926-020-00142-0 |
Abstract
This paper employs memetics to argue against the view that standardisation overwhelms the evolution of accounting. I suggest that, in an unregulated setting, accounting procedures constitute classic memes and survive according to their fitness for their environment, which is predominantly a matter of their suitability for investment decision-making. In a standardising regime, the standardising canon embodies a special kind of meme encoding ideas as actions to be imitated to realise those ideas. Evolutionary pressures and the canon develop in tandem, although not necessarily synchronously. If we accept the central tenet of memetics, which is also the assumption underlying the argument challenged here, that memes emerging before regulation were responsive to evolutionary pressures, we can analyse the responsiveness of the standardising canon by examining its relationship to a counterfactual continuation of the pre-regulated regime. The degree of synchronicity is an empirical, but elusive, question and we should follow Dennett’s recommendation that we settle for the philosophical realisations we can glean from memetics. I argue that three factors are of importance in addressing the question. Accounting memes function within a dense ecology, limiting radical and destabilising change. There has been a high degree of continuity, permeability and commonality in the intellection driving development: the same thinking has influenced policy design wherever it has taken place. Finally, the principal determinant of successful adaptation did not change on the transition to standardisation and the canon and its vehicles have survived. Consequently, we can conclude that standardisation has not disrupted the development of accounting.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
DOI/Identification number: | 10.1007/s40926-020-00142-0 |
Uncontrolled keywords: | Accounting standardisation; accounting theory; accounting practice; evolution; memetic theory. |
Subjects: | H Social Sciences > HF Commerce > HF5601 Accounting |
Divisions: | Divisions > Kent Business School - Division > Kent Business School (do not use) |
Depositing User: | Brian Rutherford |
Date Deposited: | 25 Jun 2020 16:19 UTC |
Last Modified: | 04 Jul 2023 13:04 UTC |
Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/81874 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Link to SensusAccess
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):