Skip to main content
Kent Academic Repository

Muscle recruitment and stone tool use ergonomics across three million years of Palaeolithic technological transitions

Key, Alastair J. M., Farr, Ian, Hunter, Rob, Winter, Samantha L. (2020) Muscle recruitment and stone tool use ergonomics across three million years of Palaeolithic technological transitions. Journal of Human Evolution, 144 (102796). ISSN 0047-2484. (doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2020.102796) (KAR id:81402)

PDF Author's Accepted Manuscript
Language: English


Download this file
(PDF/572kB)
[thumbnail of Key Manuscript Final.pdf]
Preview
Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader
XML Word Processing Document (DOCX)
Language: English

Restricted to Repository staff only
Contact us about this Publication
[thumbnail of Key Manuscript Final.docx]
Official URL:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/...

Abstract

Ergonomic relationships that minimize muscle activity relative to the creation of cutting stress underpin the design of modern knives, saws, and axes. The Palaeolithic archaeological record, and the > 3 million years of technological behavior that it represents, is predominantly characterized by sharp stone implements used for cutting. To date, we do not know whether Palaeolithic hominins adhered to ergonomic principles when designing stone tools, if lithic technological transitions were linked to ease-of-use advances, or even how muscularly demanding different Palaeolithic tools are on an empirically defined relative basis.

Here, we report the results of an experimental program that examines how four key stone tool types, produced between ∼ 3.3 million and ∼ 40 thousand years ago, influence muscle activation in the hominin upper limb. Using standardized laboratory-based tests designed to imitate Pleistocene cutting behaviors, surface electromyography recorded electrical activity (amplitude) in nine muscles across the hand, forearm and shoulder of modern humans during the use of replica Lomekwian, Oldowan, Acheulean and Mousterian stone tools. Results confirm digit flexors and abductors, particularly the first dorsal interosseous and flexor pollicis longus, to be the most heavily recruited muscles during the use of all tool types. Significant differences in muscle activation are, however, identified dependent on the type of stone tool used. Notably, the abductor digiti minimi, flexor pollicis longus, and biceps brachii were highly activated during handaxe use, particularly when compared to the use of Oldowan and Levallois flakes. Results are discussed in light of current understanding on the origin of Lower and Middle Palaeolithic technologies, why specific tool types were produced over others during these periods, and the extent to which early hominins produced ergonomically designed tools.

Item Type: Article
DOI/Identification number: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2020.102796
Subjects: G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > GN Anthropology
Divisions: Divisions > Division of Human and Social Sciences > School of Anthropology and Conservation
Depositing User: Alastair Key
Date Deposited: 27 May 2020 08:45 UTC
Last Modified: 04 Mar 2024 17:15 UTC
Resource URI: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/81402 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)

University of Kent Author Information

  • Depositors only (login required):

Total unique views for this document in KAR since July 2020. For more details click on the image.