Skip to main content

The feasibility and malleability of EBM+

Williamson, Jon (2020) The feasibility and malleability of EBM+. THEORIA. An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science, . ISSN 0495-4548. E-ISSN 2171-679X. (In press) (doi:10.1387/theoria.21244) (KAR id:80855)

PDF Author's Accepted Manuscript
Language: English


Creative Commons Licence
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Download (552kB) Preview
[img]
Preview
Official URL
http://dx.doi.org/10.1387/theoria.21244

Abstract

The EBM+ programme is an attempt to improve the way in which present-day evidence-based medicine (EBM) assesses causal claims: according to EBM+, mechanistic studies should be scrutinised alongside association studies. This paper addresses two worries about EBM+: (i) that it is not feasible in practice, and (ii) that it is too malleable, i.e., its results depend on subjective choices that need to be made in order to implement the procedure. Several responses to these two worries are considered and evaluated. The paper also discusses the question of whether we should have confidence in medical interventions, in the light of Stegenga's arguments for medical nihilism.

Item Type: Article
DOI/Identification number: 10.1387/theoria.21244
Uncontrolled keywords: Causality; Causation; EBM; EBM+; Russo-Williamson Thesis; RWT; Evidential pluralism; Medical nihilism
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > B Philosophy (General)
R Medicine > R Medicine (General)
Divisions: Faculties > Humanities > School of European Culture and Languages > Philosophy
Depositing User: Jon Williamson
Date Deposited: 14 Apr 2020 17:46 UTC
Last Modified: 15 Apr 2020 07:59 UTC
Resource URI: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/80855 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)
Williamson, Jon: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0514-4209
  • Depositors only (login required):

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year