Skip to main content

The perils of accountability after crisis: ambiguity, policy legacies, and value trade-offs

Hilliard, Nadia, Kovras, Iosif, Loizides, Neophytos (2020) The perils of accountability after crisis: ambiguity, policy legacies, and value trade-offs. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, . ISSN 0955-7571. (doi:10.1080/09557571.2019.1710827) (KAR id:80280)

PDF Publisher pdf
Language: English


Creative Commons Licence
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Download (849kB) Preview
[img]
Preview
Official URL
https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2019.1710827

Abstract

This article interrogates a tension at the heart of the principle of accountability: accountability as a principle of non-impunity of public officials versus accountability as a form of bureaucratic organisation and control. Although these dimensions are distinguishable in the abstract, their ambiguity has led to an expectations gap among both citizens and elites. The historical legacies of previous policies can exacerbate this expectations gap, leading to a variety of value trade-offs, with the potential to undermine other political values, such as political learning, consensus-building, and citizens' rights. We present examples of the trade-offs resulting from this expectations gap, focusing on moments of crisis in which such trade-offs can be seen most acutely, and highlight its role as a vehicle of global populism.

Item Type: Article
DOI/Identification number: 10.1080/09557571.2019.1710827
Divisions: Faculties > Social Sciences > School of Politics and International Relations
Depositing User: Neophytos Loizides
Date Deposited: 27 Feb 2020 14:17 UTC
Last Modified: 27 Feb 2020 14:19 UTC
Resource URI: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/80280 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)
Loizides, Neophytos: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0327-4643
  • Depositors only (login required):

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year