Skip to main content

The Case for Feminist Legal History

Rackley, Erika, Auchmuty, Rosemary (2020) The Case for Feminist Legal History. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 40 (4). pp. 878-904. ISSN 0143-6503. (doi:10.1093/ojls/gqaa023) (Access to this publication is currently restricted. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided) (KAR id:80267)

PDF Author's Accepted Manuscript
Language: English

Restricted to Repository staff only until 18 December 2022.
Contact us about this Publication
[thumbnail of FLH_FINAL_Feb2020.docx]
Official URL


While we may be witnessing a highpoint of interest in the lives of early women lawyers, and women’s legal history generally, feminist legal history remains largely undeveloped in the UK. Drawing on examples of women’s representation in and engagement with law and law reform in the UK and Ireland, this article delineates the method, scope and purpose of feminist legal history. It begins by exploring the place of women in traditional accounts of legal history, before going on to consider the methodological and substantive goals of feminist legal history. We argue that feminist legal history is a political project, requiring its authors to commit not only to uncovering untold stories but to challenging and revising dominant historical narratives. We conclude with a call for scholars to take up the insights and methods of feminist legal history as a means of acknowledging and celebrating the agency of those involved in past and ongoing struggles for justice and equality.

Item Type: Article
DOI/Identification number: 10.1093/ojls/gqaa023
Divisions: Divisions > Division for the Study of Law, Society and Social Justice > Kent Law School
Depositing User: Erika Rackley
Date Deposited: 26 Feb 2020 15:10 UTC
Last Modified: 16 Feb 2021 14:11 UTC
Resource URI: (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)
Rackley, Erika:
  • Depositors only (login required):


Downloads per month over past year