Carruthers, Peter, Williams, David M. (2019) Comparative Metacognition. Animal Behavior and Cognition, 6 (4). pp. 278-288. ISSN 2372-5052. (doi:10.26451/abc.06.04.08.2019) (KAR id:78263)
PDF
Publisher pdf
Language: English
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
|
|
Download this file (PDF/298kB) |
Preview |
Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader | |
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.26451/abc.06.04.08.2019 |
Abstract
We argue that comparative psychologists have been too quick to jump to metacognitive interpretations of their data. We examine two such cases in some detail. One concerns so-called "uncertainty monitoring" behavior, which we show to be better explained in terms of first-order estimates of risk. The other concerns informational search, which we argue is better explained in terms of a first-order curiosity-like motivation that directs questions at the environment.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
DOI/Identification number: | 10.26451/abc.06.04.08.2019 |
Uncontrolled keywords: | Curiosity, Interest, Metacognition, Question, Risk evaluation, Uncertainty |
Subjects: | Q Science > QL Zoology |
Divisions: | Divisions > Division of Human and Social Sciences > School of Psychology |
Depositing User: | David Williams |
Date Deposited: | 05 Nov 2019 14:21 UTC |
Last Modified: | 05 Nov 2024 12:42 UTC |
Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/78263 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Link to SensusAccess
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):